Conrad Burns 100 Percent
Uploader Comments (mcoleman0)
All Comments (20)
-
I speak as an outsider. I am not a Montanan, I live in Maryland, but I have been following the campaign in Montana for a while for my Government class. I was overjoyed to hear that Tester had won. If not only because of the corruption involved and associated with Burns but because I, myself, prefer democratic beliefs. Good luck and well wishes to you, Montana!
-
Guess what Burns fans?
You're losers.
buuuuuuurrrrrrrrnnnnnnnnnnnnn
-
We'd give your substance but it's a secret. We can't tell you because you'd RUIN it!
I'm a Democrat. I want a democratic senator (two of them). I want someone who's more open minded. I want someone who thinks about the future.
I'm proud to have voted for Jon Tester.
-
Thanks, Keith. So how much is the GOP paying you to go around the net and hype Burns?
-
Actually, it's more of a midwestern accent, not southern. Burns is from Missouri. He should move back.
-
Conrad Burns has been good for Montana, is good for Montana, and will continue to be good for Montana. He deserves 6 more years.
fuck conrad!
Mikelarkenson2 5 years ago 2
That's exactly the kind of response I would expect. It is why Democrats will be in power for two years and Tester will be a one term Senator.
mcoleman0 5 years ago
In a year when the President was at all time low approval, support for the Iraq War collapsed, our US Senate candidate was constantly attacked with corrupt lobbyist accusations and the Democratic Governor had a 70% approval rating—we regained the State House, achieved a tie in the State Senate, swept County Commissioner, our US House Representative won with a landslide and our US Senator lost by 2,800 votes statewide. A hoolow democratic victory indeed
mcoleman0 5 years ago
It is rather incredible that many Republicans do not use the service! On the issues, I welcome discussion on Burn's voting record and stance. Organic farmer Testers ads only critisize his personality or the repeat the smae false accusations the party began in August 2005. Where is the substance?
mcoleman0 5 years ago
There you go again--more false statements! Answer me this, why is Burns not subject to any investigations and why is Abromoff's lawyer a democrat who also had Clinton as a client? Something to hide? Ask the Democrats!
mcoleman0 5 years ago
Tootsiedear is another that doesn't let facts get in the way of comments. "Campaign promises" was negated by a Supreme Court ruling and the "embarass" comments must be Abromoff which the Justice Deptartment just said Burns was not part of.
mcoleman0 5 years ago