Sand Creek Massacre Part 2
Uploader Comments (7thUSCavalryman)
Top Comments
-
I enjoyed how the white accounts were stretched to the limits of the immagination to justify the Sand Creek massac.., I mean um, "battle". For an encore, maybe the producers of this unbiased historical 'documentery' can do a peice about how the Jews provoked the Nazis to retaliate against them for starting World War 1.
-
2 hirds of the murdered indians in Sand Creek where women and children. THis wasn`t a battle. It was a massacre. But the so called indian wars historian talks more baout the killed us Soldiers. That shown a lot about american racism lasting until today.
All Comments (48)
-
Classic "He said, she said" scenario we have here. Depending on who's telling the story as to which side is demonized the most. The truth lies somewhere in between. However, there is NEVER an excuse for taking the lives of innocent women and children. And most certainly, there's NO HONOR in desecrating the bodies of those slain in battle. This is one of the most egregious acts of barbarism I've ever heard of. "Vengence is MINE, sayeth the Lord". There was no justice served 11-29-1864.
-
I'm going to post my response about this in the side bar and send it to you in a private messege. I don't want the information about Sand Creek to roll off because that is more important to this video.
-
Major Edward Wynkoop who had been in command of Fort Lyon may have promised them protection and issued them rations. THIS WAS THE REASON GENERL CURTIS REMOVED WYNKOOP FROM COMMAND THOUGH. Wynkoop was issuing rations to Indians the Army considered hostile.
-
The video actually disputes there was any peace made between Black Kettle and Chivington at Camp Weld. There was certainly no peace made ''a day before.''
Governor Evans sent a letter the day after Camp Weld to Sam Colley telling him that they had made NO peace with the Cheyenne and told him not to issue rations to them.
No one ever has asserted John Chivington gave the Cheyenne any flag.
-
Presumably the Cheyenne didn't take horses, women and mutilate people because they were hungry though. You would think these raiders wouldn't be kidnapping women and girls if they were having trouble feeding themselves because then you just have another mouth to feed. Actions like that make one question how tight the food supply really was.
-
That's a good point Dealz. The eradication of the buffalo was no doubt factor in the conflicts over the years. I wouldn't deny it. Cutting off the food supply is common tactic in warfare. If you can't feed yourself you can't fight. Any city that has ever been besieged or nation that has been naval blockaded can testify to that. Of course in 1864 the Buffalo and other game were not completely gone.
Post on utube how the Setters rode West with a (Buffalo Extermination) program met to Starve the Plains Natives into submission. Which anybody who knows basics information about Plains Natives knows the Baffalo was everything to the Native's their food source and their home.
Maybe this is why they were raiding Wagons and towns. to get food sense their main food supply was becoming depleted by the New setters coming in. Its not like they were getting enought for their Indian Agencys.
Dealz1988 2 years ago
When the Sand Creek event occurred Major Scott Anthony was in charge of Fort Lyon. He made NO promise of protection to the Indians. He told them he COULD NOT make peace with them which is why he sent them away from the Fort. Major Anthony says he told the Cheyenne to stay away from the Fort and even FIRED ON THEM several days before Chivington arrived when the Cheyenne approached the Fort. Hardly a friendly act is it?
7thUSCavalryman 2 years ago
I'm going to link that bit from ''The Fighting Cheyennes in the top of the side bar and send it to you in private message.
7thUSCavalryman 2 years ago
Non of this should should be taken to mean that killing noncombatants is an acceptable practice. There is a great deal wrong and misrepresented about Sand Creek though.
7thUSCavalryman 2 years ago