Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Clairvoyance test with 3 & 5 photos (2 in 1)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,582
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 30, 2008

In this video I am performing clairvoyance test with 3 and 5 pictures only. ( by suggestions) I place the pictures inside two envelops then randomly select three envelops out of 5 and then I say what pictures inside before opening. In case with 3 photos, I am trying to recognize exact envelope with exact photo. Holding an envelope I see the shape -- symbols, signs, different details -- of the picture inside, but not the exact image as it is.
I'm open for your questions, comments and suggestions. It might seem easy 3 out of 3 or 3 out of 5 to "guess" but try it yourself..:)

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (pavelprorok)

  • @pavelprorok I am not convinced with these experiments since you could have easily cheated; however, I statistically analyzed your first experiment with a total of 3 pictures and my two-tailed T-test shows no evidence for your claim (P=0.07) but on the second (5) it did show evidence with odds of 62 to 1. Furthermore, I combined the overall hits of your 2 experiments and it did show good evidence with odds of 909 to 1 (P=0.0011) You may have ESP, but then again, you could have cheated...

  • @IceAges14Aces Thank you for taking time and make calculations, I did not cheat if I would I would perform something like I dont know 3 out of 500 photos or something, video was shot in one go, no editing it has been checked by professional. Also, I have been tested by 2 PhD professors same test with photos beside professor there was 3 graduate student present during test and I have an affidavit letter from them.

  • OK, as you didn't post the result of your negotiations with the JREF (as you promised you would) I'll do the honours:

    Pavel was unable to state clearly what he would do. He could not agree on a simple demonstration of his abilities; one where we could be sure he is not cheating. In accordance with JREF rules, his application file was closed and he is welcome to reapply.

    Personally, I doubt that he ever will. All talk.

  • @TheboyPaj I posted video and there is info details next to it.. If you not blind you will see that there is NO reasons for JREF not to accapt protocol that We negotiated with THEM for over a year.. they made a uturn in last minute not me..

  • why did you bother reading the third envelope? If you knew for shore what the first two were, you shouldn't have to read the third. You would already know.???????? Im not a skeptic, i just like asking questions. Good job!!

  • Thank you for the comment. Well I opened it cause, other wise some one would ask WHy didnt I? and say that I could have same photo there or something.

see all

All Comments (28)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • DerrenBrown must be shitting himself

  • Even I knew it...

  • What's wrong with being a skeptic? It only means you don't blindly accept what others tell you. Isn't that a good quality to have?

  • Pavel, you 're wonderful man! Be happy! With love, Eva

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more