Richard Dawkins Supports the Murder of Innocent Children

Richard Dawkins says it's okay to kill a one-year old child with an incurable disease!

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Richard
• Dawkins
• Infanticide
• Children
• Murder
• God
• Delusion
• Support
• Apologist
• Genocide
• William
• Lane
• Craig
• Atheist
• Atheism
• Brights
• Evolution
• Charles
• Darwin

[Nytmare8u]

Has Stephen Hawkins heard this? WOW

[cmdrkoenig67]

Please...God supports the murders of innocent children...He does it all through the OT.

[BrotherMichael1000]

@cmdrkoenig67 Your leader argues he cannot find a reasonable moral argument against infanticide. Further if you had seen this full interview you would also find that he finds no moral argument against rape either. Why would I cry about what God does? Further who are you or I to judge God? Man who is double minded from his birth who lies, betrays, covets, murders, steals, and destroys all for his lust and you would dare think yourself God's judge? Deut. 32:39 1 Samuel 2:6

[cmdrkoenig67]

@BrotherMichael1000 Your God killed plenty of babies and I don't hear you crying about that.

[BrotherMichael1000]

@cmdrkoenig67 Your own leader of new atheism sees nothing wrong with killing a 1 year old. His own words. Your sides argument on this matter would now be considered hypocritical and further your sides credibility is shot.

[TarousDT]

It doesn't matter that these children are innocent. It's either a painful death not a painful death.

[thelossbloodlock]

Either let your kid suffer in miserable agony or release it from it's pain? Is it really such a hard decision?

[mrwho995]

@JohananRaatz

With all due respect, that is mere postulation, and one I simply disagree with.

"When people talk about things like this as though they might be legitimate they give people the idea that they might actually be."

Yet we have reached the conclusion that in some circumstances, euthanasia, be it a child or not, is the ethical decision to make. Should we simply not allow any development in society for the fear that, somehow, it could cause a majority to suddenly become so amoral?

[JohananRaatz]

@mrwho995 Well it's hard to draw specific links and tell that this or that thinker caused someone to push the envelope. However I highly doubt there would be people thinking it was ok in general cases (as is the case with some politicians I know) was the idea not bandied about by some academic first. When people talk about things like this as though they might be legitimate they give people the idea that they might actually be. And that's dangerous.