A short clip taken from the last one (Eyewitness - Hoboken) showing only the collapse of the WTC-1 core remnant ("spire") in real time. More on the topic:
How does a "spire" disintegrate into fine dust in a "pancake" collapse put into motion by office fires? Of course NIST abandoned its pancake theory... But people still believe it. Google: Kevin Ryan NIST. How do tiny fragments of human remains end up on the roof of the Deutche Bank Building years later? And what about WTC7? The official story has more holes than Swiss cheese. Call for a new 9/11 investigation, now. Half of today's gov't policy stems from 9/11. It's important, people.
For me, this clip provides some of the greatestevidence of controlled demolition. If it were indeed a gravitational collapse, the "spire" (remaining core columns) would have fallen OVER to one side...not straight down through the path of greatest resistance. It seems pretty obvious those columns were cut.
You cant tell from that distance. I live right by Manhattan and have been to the WTC before 9/11 MANY times. It is to far to tell anything from the cameras location. The spire may look small in the video, but it was actually a giant.
The steel didnt actually turn into dust. CT's just say that, IDK y. They mustve never seen the pictures of the aftermath...where u can see thousands of 12 foot long pieces of steel EVERYWHERE.
that turn to dust !! WAKE THE FUCK UP !! AE911TRUTH
Headshothorror4488 6 months ago
How does a "spire" disintegrate into fine dust in a "pancake" collapse put into motion by office fires? Of course NIST abandoned its pancake theory... But people still believe it. Google: Kevin Ryan NIST. How do tiny fragments of human remains end up on the roof of the Deutche Bank Building years later? And what about WTC7? The official story has more holes than Swiss cheese. Call for a new 9/11 investigation, now. Half of today's gov't policy stems from 9/11. It's important, people.
peapod8 1 year ago 2
What known force can exsct this type of effect on steel?
MindSprite 1 year ago
For me, this clip provides some of the greatestevidence of controlled demolition. If it were indeed a gravitational collapse, the "spire" (remaining core columns) would have fallen OVER to one side...not straight down through the path of greatest resistance. It seems pretty obvious those columns were cut.
mule1969 2 years ago 2
May this indicate the use of a scalar devise? I don't know what one is exactly but i think i know part of it's function.
gik130 4 years ago
Lets not take into account the 3 stories high pile of beams when the fires went out.
Enlightend 4 years ago
that was the core of the building not the spire
videoviewer224 4 years ago
You cant tell from that distance. I live right by Manhattan and have been to the WTC before 9/11 MANY times. It is to far to tell anything from the cameras location. The spire may look small in the video, but it was actually a giant.
parrot201 4 years ago
But not these particular pieces, which clearly turned to dust before they hit the ground.
Look at all the views of the collapse of the spire in
WTC-1 collapses from "9-11 Explosive Reality"
There is no solid object left to hit the ground, no outline of a solid object continuing to fall along the trajectory of the initial intact columns.
plaguepuppy 4 years ago
The steel didnt actually turn into dust. CT's just say that, IDK y. They mustve never seen the pictures of the aftermath...where u can see thousands of 12 foot long pieces of steel EVERYWHERE.
noconspiracy911 4 years ago