2011 Ford Mustang Shelby GT-350 (HD)

First off, I'd like to point out my song choice. As you may already know, this is Born to Be wild, and the reason for this song is because the old version would have gone great with the car 40 years back, but hey, this is a new car and i thought hey, how about using a whole new remake of the song for this whole new remake of this car. and other reasons is because, we all know that mustangs are born to be wild. The 2011 Shelby GT350, the guys at shelby have certainly proved what they are capable of! after the purchase of your Ford Mustang GT, The kit starts at exactly 33,995 dollars. This new car has Fords new 5.0 liter engine. The 45th anniversary edition represents the energy of Carroll Shelby and his team. And hey! this is my first HD video!! (I have slow internet so it took 2 hours with the internet being fast) SO PLEASE ENJOY!

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• New
• 2011
• 2010
• ford
• mustang
• gt500
• gt
• gt350
• three
• fifty
• 350
• twisterx5
• shelby
• wild
• horse
• adam
• lambert
• born
• to
• be
• newest
• slideshow
• 40
• years
• decades
• featured
• good

[PredaDrake]

SORRY TO ASK, WHO IS THE SONG COVER ARTIST??? A RESPONSE IN HIGHLY APPRECIATED, THANK YOU

[TwisterX5]

@PredaDrake The artist is Adam Lambert. No problem, thanks for the comment!

[heydude76]

great video so the gt 500 can beat the gt350 or whats the deal same car but different kinda thing?

[TwisterX5]

@heydude76 Well the GT500 has a 5.4 liter engine and the GT350 has a 5.0 liter engine, both produce about the same amount of power and the gt350 has a more aerodynamic body along with the small holes on the front bumper to cool down the brakes, both cost around the same as well. i guess they'd be close, so depending on your style would probably make up most peoples choices on which one to get. the GT350 would probably be faster on a race track, and the GT500 would be faster on the drag strip.

[Ponyimd]

you spelt thumb incorrectly. Nice video tribute to an awesome car though.

[TwisterX5]

@Ponyimd I know how to spell it, it was just an accidental flaw. thanks anyway.

[Jgeneraledger23]

@mxd6 I'd pay 90 grand for that '66 (that would be a steal).

[mxd6]

The price is close to $90k and there is no way it's worth that price.

[guapoalex1]

vueno a mi me encantan los mustangs pero como hicieron el video no me gusto

[34D2234]

@34D2234 the new mustangs might be more powerful, but clearly their not even near as fast as the old ones were the 2011 gt-500 weighs in at 4300lbs, they trimmed 750lbs off them, the old mustangs weighed in just over 2500lbs, my 65 hard top weighs just 2375lbs with the 289ci in it.

[34D2234]

i seen a video of the 2011 shelby gt-350 racing a 66 gt-350R around a track, the new one handled better as the original one did also but was a stiffer ride, the new one did a 149mph run down the main straight, but the older one was faster at 160mph, the drag race at the end of the video wrote the story, the 66 shelby smoked the new shelby, 10:26 to an 11:38

[4sake123]

@1jamers

I'm sorry but the mustang or "rustang" as you call it(which is a stupid insult since its a new car and doesn't have any rust) looks nothing like the mustang II. I also don't think the camaro looks that much like the 69 model. The challenger is the most retro looking of the 3 and my opinion looks the best. Maybe you should google a mustang II and find out what it actually looks like.

[1jamers]

some one tell me why ford did a remake of a 1977 rustang ll put a cheesy ass body kit and a few lame ass bolt ons! and then call it RETRO? cuz thats what the new rustang looks like!!! chevy RETRO comaro to look like 1967-1969 dodge RETRO chalinger to look like 1970 chalinger! ford RETRO rustang to look like 1978 rustang ll. ugly ugly ugly!!!!!!

[theslayer246]

this cover fucking sucks

[MysticDMBherb]

I don't like the look of this at all, ugly