National Geographic Science & Conspiracy Part 8

National Geographic Science & Conspiracy Part 8

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• National
• Geographic
• Science
• and
• Conspiracy
• debunking
• 9/11
• conspiracy
• theories
• nanothermite
• thermite
• demolition
• wtc
• richard
• gage
• steven
• jones
• dylan
• avery
• loose
• change
• ae911truth
• nist

[AceofDlamonds]

9/11 was a terrorist attack. period. Dumbasses.

[WallStwizkid]

@KJC24 Why do you even bother. Let them believe it, who cares. They don't even do anything besides make videos and go on youtube. They'll be 90 years old and still talking about "inside job". Lol it's pointless to even engage them. This show proved a lot, but I think the most important thing it proved was, they'll never admit they were wrong. Because when you think about, they know it will make them look completely idiotic. If everybody ignores them they'll just talk to themselves and do nothing

[newm123]

Truthers = Idiots with no girlfriends, who didn't get enough hugs as children, and live under the house in there mom's basements.

[12weasel100]

@TheHONKYLIPS no you have not repeated logical points you asked a shit question that needed a opinion based answer and was structured to to fit your bias and was built on lies. Prove to me first that NATO was actually carrying out that exact same scenario that day just outside NY. For every opinion based answer you think you can provide someone else has one that will conflict with it. That is why you need facts to support your statements. Something you fail to provide. You fail again you retard

[TheHONKYLIPS]

@12weasel100 clearly you cannot iv repeated twice very logical points which you have ignored and just insulted me im guessing your in middle school and need to grow up a little dont respond i wont check it im done talking to you

p.s. i feel sorry for your mother

[12weasel100]

@TheHONKYLIPS of course I can take in information. However unlike you idiot I process it and if it is factual I understand and retain it. You have not provided any factual information worth retaining. All you have done is spewed out a lot of shit with no facts to support any of it. It is all your own opinions and specualtion. don't care to hear what your shitty view points are we want to hear facts to prove controlled demo. Shit you are an idiot.

[TheHONKYLIPS]

@AceofDlamonds i was under the impression we were talking about american terror answer the question can you name a anyone i dont believe you can.

[AceofDlamonds]

@TheHONKYLIPS

Any positive claim without hard evidence backing itself up is nothing but speculation and bias....You're prepared to believe a low-end physicist, an architect, and a THEOLOGIAN on matters of the fall of WTC and damage to the Pentagon. Now you're bashing NIST, this is hilarious. When conspiracy theorists bring SCIENCE into the argument, they are playing the scientists' game. They're fair game.

[TheHONKYLIPS]

@12weasel100 are you unable to take in information you dont agree with how is NIST not taking mandatory actions in investigating something like this illogical garbage how is george bush saying we never imagined someone would try to do this when the government was having practice simulations of exactly that on the morning of 911, illogical garbage and how is it biased to want answers to these things it opens the possibility of being proven wrong.

[12weasel100]

@TheHONKYLIPS again thanks for a bullshit deluded little response that was pure shit. You have not presented any logical statements to deny. You have presented your own biased opinions and view points. You have not even attempted to provide a single fact to logically explain why you feel there is a need to ask the question you do. You present nothing but garbage.

[TheHONKYLIPS]

@AceofDlamonds im sorry what? do you still believe my statement is false?

[TheHONKYLIPS]

@12weasel100 dont decide you know exactly what i believe then deny anything logical i say. i dont care about anybodys speculations what is important is NIST not doing things that are mandatory in investigating something like this NIST not letting us see how they figured out exactly how fire took down wtc7 our government saying we never imagined this when they had war games going on simulating exactly what was really happening the morning of 911. do you know what the gulf of tonkin incident was?