Ken Miller on what Darwin got Wrong (Part 9)

I was able to sit down and talk with Dr. Miller. In this video he discusses what Darwin got wrong.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Intelligent Design
• Evolution
• Theistic God
• Creationism

[LoricaLady]

If anyone comments to me and there is no reply that will be because once again I have been Expelled from an evolution promoting video though I do not try to get anyone to believe in any Diety or in the Bible and try to stick strictly to science and logic.

[LoricaLady]

Cont. They also show musculature nowhere to be seen on the fossil. Why? Why to help it in its wonderful transition to land of course. Of course a vertical tail, such as is characteristic of fish, would make such a transition more than a little difficult. So the replica has strange stick like looking fin-legs such as are seen nowhere in the world, for helping it climb onto land. This is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the pseudo science, verbal & visual, in evolutionary trheory.

[LoricaLady]

Cont. Think of all the anti science in that . 1st, all Tik was 100% fish, a lobed fin fish.  2nd they are telling us they know how its invisible descendants' invisible descendants reproduced (how do we tell "missing links" from never existed?) and ask us to fill in the invisible dots from it to tetrapods. 2nd Google Melbourne Museum Tiktaalik replica. Note the real fossil has tiny frontal fins & a conveniently missing back end. The replica's fins are about 5X bigger than the fossil's. Cont.

[LoricaLady]

Cont. There is not a single ex. in the rocks of a fin/foot, fish/tetrapod, scale/feather, lizard/bird. (That includes archaeopteryx who had fully developed feathers & no characteristics which are unseen in modern birds, plus even many evolutionists have stated that archaeoperyx is just "a perching bird.) We are told based on words like "characteristics of..." that certain fossils turned into a different genus. For ex. Miller says Tiktaalik is "as good as it gets" for a "transition." Cont.

[LoricaLady]

Cont. The world knew long before Darwin that there are many species of animals. But as Mendell observed & as 100% of evidence shows, tho they may change their species & indeed do so (200 species of bees alone), bees stay bees, peas stay peas...and bacteria, viruses, bacteria, etc. etc. stay bacteria, viruses, etc. Darwin & evoutionists have taught that fins & ffish turn into feet & tetrapods, & scales & lizards turn into feathers & birds. Billions & tons of fossils show the opposite! Cont.

[LoricaLady]

Darwin never got anything right and, like him, evoutionists build speculative stories and present them as if they are actually evidence. For ex. the title of his book is Origin of Species but he never shows any origin of any species whatsoever. The whole book is nothing but armchair speculation presented as if it is somehow scientific. There is no use of the scientific method at all, as for ex. we see with Mendell who kept meticulous data and provided something truly useful to biology. Cont.