3/5 Greatest Tank Battles - Battle of Kursk - Northern Front

Greatest Tank Battles Pressents the First Part of the Greatest Tank Battle in Warfare History. This is about the Nothern Attack.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• History
• Discovery
• Military
• Channel
• Greatest
• Tank
• Battles
• Kursk
• Northern
• Front
• WW2
• Tiger
• Panther
• t34
• tank
• StuG

[the82spartans]

I like pie.

[ThePanzerWarMachine]

@the82spartans

do do i, i prefer aple to chocolate.

[ThePanzerWarMachine]

@Tyco200

Yes. the High velocity Gun on the panzer 4 ''H'' ''I'' ''j'' was also the most accurate tank gun on the Battlefield.

The Sight of the T-34-76 weren't as Good as that of the German Guns, the Ammunition at the start of the war wasn't that good as at the end of the war! And the Battle between the Sherman and T-34 is over before it Starts. T-34 Wins hands down. Read Combat reports of the U.S in Korea.

[xjager513]

those stugs are so underrated, they survived all the way till berlins final battle.

[Abismabagrandatimaba]

Hello.

Please, translate into spanish or subtitle.

[BenZedrene]

I noticed that this series recurrently repeats itself

[amartinjoe]

oh man; if I was an anti-tank gunner and my round bounced off an enemy tank, I'd be shitting bricks.

[loocsiyeltsakcir]

@Dreachon

Give me a source saying it wasn't. And even if they were rare, my point still stands solid with the points listed below about the F-34. And, the upgrades were rare compared to the vast number of 75mm shermans,

[Dreachon]

@loocsiyeltsakcir

In 1944 the red army still possessed large nubmer of the T-34/76, once more your making thing up.

[loocsiyeltsakcir]

@Dreachon

Then take the fact that combined firepower of all the shermans (75mm, 76 m1a1, 76mm m1a2), would be considerably less than the 95% 85mm T-34s. Next, it is safe to say that the F-34 is slightly better than the M3 because of the fact that the M3 didn't use such APCR rounds. Even without them, the F-34 performed better than early M3 models, and only slightly worse than late M3 models. Consider the fact that my the time D-day happened it was ALL t-34/85s

[loocsiyeltsakcir]

@Dreachon

I have not made up anything as you claim I have. Tell me one thing I have made up and I will cite the source and give it to you. And, cite a source that says the exact bonus in terms of armor that "quality" gives and the fact that the F-34's APCR roudn was not the rarest shell. And, the Sherman burned less AFTER updates late in the war, keep in mind, LATE. Now, if you take the fact that more than half the shermans at the end of the war were 75mm----

[Dreachon]

@loocsiyeltsakcir

And were exactly do I claim that I hate russians, what I hate are idiots like flossy26 and a whole host like him who care nothing about the truth.

And why am I biased when I can tell the T-34 for what it really is, unlike you and your made up facts I'm staying to the well established data.

[Dreachon]

@loocsiyeltsakcir

No it wasn't for someone claiming to be so smart and having an IQ 50 points higher than me you keep making the same dumb mistakes in terms of quality the sherman armour is better than the T-34.

I assume you still haven't asked Cosmin to give his opinion on the armour quality?

[Dreachon]

@loocsiyeltsakcir

No your data is flawed, your making claims that do not match with the data from well respected reserachers.

Your claims about the 76.2mm F-34 beeing better than the 75mm M3 do not match and your only argument there is that you are using the most rarest of it's shell.

The same you do for the 85mm, you again take it's most rarest shell and claim another bogus armour penetration.