GIANT of INDIA
Top Comments
All Comments (4,067)
-
is that real?
-
false and homosexual
-
Agreed on the other points, however...
["NG supports evolution. If these photos are true it would prove the Bible correct. That's the last thing NG wants."]
Implying giants dont already exist in the fossil record...
Implying any path in mutations wouldnt have branches of giants...
Implying I havent personally witnessed evolution in my fellow life forms...
Believe what you want, just dont expect if people dont give a f@#$ cause it was written by a tribe of savages.
-
@WoodlandRavah and of course we can believe National Geographic who support:
global warming brought on by human activity - a lie
the official gov't story of the killing of Bin Laden - a lie
the official gov't story and "science" behind 911 - a lie
In other words, whatever National Geographic supports, believe the opposite. Therefore these photos are for the most part true. NG supports evolution. If these photos are true it would prove the Bible correct. That's the last thing NG wants.
-
Your all a bunch of cocksucking moron's with no common sence ,that think its fake,do you honestly think they want this real and i mean REAL information to be public world wide.The same with the BILLY MEIER information on THEYFLY.COM .All the scumbag religious bastards would'nt want that would they. WAKE UP from your delusional zombie state of mind control from these motherfucker ,asshole ,evil bastard religions!
-
On second thought...The newspaper article states that the 'National Geographic Team' discovered these remains. That makes the story very credible.
-
Nice WHITE CLEAN shirt!
-
Wow that is sooo weird it looks sooooo fake
-
those are some shollow graves for such big fake skeletons
-
definitely positively fake and gay...
fake and gay
scareless182 6 months ago 6
ass hole from 2007 .... FLAG AND REPORTED
kaostwenty2 4 months ago