Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

HHO SWISS INOX 9 NEW 60 PLATES CELL

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
38,732
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 1, 2010

This 60 plates cell was tested on brute force up to 14 liters but ended with some major leaking problems my design mistake. This is about a lot of experimenting during the past year and a half. The conclusions are combined in what I am working on at the moment with a great still silent helper.
I am planning a selling unit by the end of the year if all the testing will please me and my good friend.

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ammanninox)

  • this is nonsense. why not just collect the hydrogen and discard the oxygen? there is so much oxygen in our atmosphere, if you really want to store energy, you should just store hydrogen.

    and if you want both, are you aware that they are much more useful when stored seperately? i mean, one tank full of hydrogen and one full of oxygen. Much better, especially if you want (rocket) engines to run on it.

    Best Regards. By the way, i think you actually know better and are a fraud.

  • @kurtilein3 Inside the combustion chamber of a car engine there is only the oxygen that is sucked in with the air, so if you add hydrogen you rob oxygen needed for the combustion=loosing power. Since you are so smart you know that storage in pressured tanks is critical. Rockets have separate tanks because to store HHO combined is like having a time bomb awaiting for a spark to make it explode.

    Besides I only delight in showing how to build cells, so if you wish yes I am a fraud, what are you?

  • Your crosshatching and cleaning of the plates has completely no effect on the electrolysis. Effort in vain.

  • @mikeyz75 I have all kinds of contradicting information about the subject and by now it seems you might be right. Well this is all a trial and error experimenting so I thank you very much for your information.

see all

All Comments (90)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • that x-haching concept is interesting-- it could increase the surface area of the plates a lot, try a current test at 12volts, one cell with-out x-hatching against an exact twin with x-hatching and see if there"s a difference. cheers Rob.

  • @ammanninox - ah I see, I was remembering back to my school days where we saw a teacher put 2 carbon rods into a H shaped container of water, then when electricity applied, we got hydrogen from the Negative rod and Oxygen from the positive(or other way around!), and it didn't seem to matter how close those rods were. With regards to"wool, I was thinking of stainless steel scouring pads you use for washing -surely the surface area would be very large for the amount of space they occupy.

  • You do some nice work. I am just getting my first one made. I have 316L ss plates that are 3*4*1/8 is that too thick using 20 amps in your opinion?

  • Hello friend,

    you sell your cell? if yes send me your email

  • I'm sure no one can fault the quality of your work. Thank you for sharing it with the world. Could you please say where I can get those small pipe fittings from. I can only get large ones from plumbing suppliers.?? Thank you again.

  • your newest cel in 0:24/ 7:30 fram can show or describe how this cell is put to gether

    if you made it no holes design for current leakage with a top and bottom manifold

    it would rock post some video of how this unit is put together, it great looking cell

    post some result s of production

  • @eloid777 seach youtube for "Resonant LC circuit with Tube Cells " /watch?v=QYqAbBqBzy8

    amazing production in hot water with resonace like stan meyers experiments using HTE (High temperature electrolysis idea.

  • @TheMrblazer320 In stan meyers video he stats he using normal tap water, But he did not state if it was warm

    or hot water. do search on Wikipedia. High temperature electrolysis is more efficient economically than traditional room-temperature electrolysis because some of the energy is supplied as heat, which is cheaper than electricity, and because the electrolysis reaction is more efficient at higher temperatures couple this with stastan meyer resonace and you have some serious hhoproduction

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more