\ / ][ |\| y |_ (1965) 2
Uploader Comments (keyboardhero521)
Top Comments
-
@klbasey Warhol's end was not to amuse or entertain us, but to make circular arguments about culture and its relation to consumption, beauty and artifice. Undoubtedly Kubrick was the superior cinematic craftsman and greater observer of the human condition. But Warhol's intentions and aesthetic profoundly changed first world culture forever and fed into the no-wave movement. You may not dig it, and that's understandable, but this is part of the DNA of the American pop landscape.
All Comments (21)
-
I love Warhol's films. There's an abstract, blank quality to this film especially, like 'here's a movie--watch Gerard and Ondine, or watch the guys in the back torturing the kid, or don't watch anything. But we're going to carry on.' I love the attitude and the conceptualization of the film, that one can make a film with bare bones, no real set or props. You can just forget the story and dance, part of the time. I love it.
-
I like his moves
-
The music WAS beautiful SCUMBABY!!!
-
@klbasey You know, they can't really be compared like that. Of course, obviously Kubrick was a much greater filmmaker. But this is something completely different. It's underground art.
-
Sounds like it worked for you and I as well ;]
-
@keyboardhero521 no.
-
What a pretentious dick
-
The infamous whip lash
-
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORIIIIIIIIIIIII
IING. Don't get me wrong, I love art and art films, but I do dislike warhole. He's full of shit.
1,200 people now know that Warhol is a hack compared to Kubrick
klbasey 1 year ago
@klbasey Well that's a little harsh wouldnt you say?
keyboardhero521 1 year ago 5