www.evo-cars.de: SSC Ultimate Aero

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
145,709
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 1, 2007

www.evo-cars.de SSC Ultimate Aero

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 12 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • holy cow, im a european and i have to say hand down apart from stereotypes and stupid prejudice, a pure brutal driving machine which to me is more appealing than the "collectors item" veyron that looks like an oversized chromed out easter egg or a vw beetle r32 on steroids :D sure the engineered w-16 quad-turbo is an achievement, but keep in mind,the ssc uses half the cylinders, half the chargers and less displacement yet generates both more hp and more torque!

  • Guess I have to sell my Veyron.........:D

see all

All Comments (538)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • SSC=FTW

    VEYRON= unhappy face

  • fuckin nice kar

    

  • @CHUUMPASS that was one of the greatest commens i have ever read. cheers to you

  • people need to stfu and see a race between the two bugatti weighs twice as much of bugatti and ssc would be faster because the ssc was tested on old worn out roads ssc ftw.

  • @AdangerousRETARD The Aero could have gone faster & they've had 4 years to prove it but never did.

    The Veryon is probably the bets car ever built and has the backing of the world's motor press. Nobody has driven this thing.

  • @StuRaz my point is the ssc would be a hell of a lot faster in the conditions bugatti had and the veyron wouldve sucked ass where ssc tested their car.

  • @AdangerousRETARD Right. So what? The Bugatti did a average run of 268mph verified by GPS. Doesn't make a difference what time they did it. SSC did their run where they wanted and they did what they did. There literally is no way of putting it any more simple. There is no room for argument.

  • @StuRaz no they couldnt have. they are a small company. the bugattis run was bullshit anyways. they waited for a certain time of day for the air density and so on. ssc's run was on a close public road. dont tell me "end of argument" btw makes you sound like a little pussy

  • @V8Supercar1 They spend time there to get the feel of the car and to tune the chassis and handling. That's obvious. But to say it handles so well based on a laptime is just plain thick. Corvettes have to be physically man handled around the track, constantly wrestled into control.

    I actually think the CTS-V is pretty good, the best car America currently make.

  • @StuRaz: I don't care how much grip your tires have. If you dont have a great suspension setup you are not gonna handle well. "Cars like the Corvette just rely on tyres and a wide track and it works until you lose grip."

    Thats so far from the truth I don't even know where to begin. Why do you think manufacturers spend so much time on the Nurburgring? It sure isn't to test tire grip. The 09 Cadillac CTS-V was practically built on the Nurburgring.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more