CBC News Sunday interview with Victor Malarek part 2/2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,155
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 28, 2009

CBC News Sunday interview with Victor Malarek on prostitution and his book "The Johns, Sex for Sale and the Men Who Buy It" part 2/2

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @MultiSmartass1 LOL so because the demand is lower its okay to completely ignore the fact that women hire prostitutes as well and there are male victims of sex traffiking?

    That is a double standard. Yes men run societies that is because MEN are the only ones willing to get anything done if women think they can do a better job they are welcome to try but something tells me they really dont want to.

    and do you know why organized crime profits from traffking?

    BECAUSE IT'S ILLEGAL!!!

  • @MultiSmartass1 Actually yes they are all traffik victims (regardless of whether they are male or female) are often beaten, raped, sexually assualted or even killed regardless of what type of work they are forced to do. again you seen to be only focused on the female victims of traffiking and not the men. and even if the child soldier isn ot being raped he is most certainly being abused as long as there is no rape occuring its okay then to force them to fight in war?

  • @MultiSmartass1 They are not exactly the same thing but they really are no different from eachother from a moral standpoint. So if a man would rather just have an upfront business transaction with a hooker rather then be manipulated by a gold digger isnt that better for him then?

    If that is the case then the hooker is the more honest one.

  • @Zain844 There's no double standard simply because the demand and supply is not as high on the male side as on the female side.

    There isnt a major demand for male gigolos or hookers for women.

    Also, keep in mind, women dont run societies-men do.

    They also run the underworld and organized crime groups which deal in sex trafficking and profit from it.

    It may not be right for a woman to pay for a male hooker but that is not the major problem here-female prostitution is.

  • @Zain844 Since the video deals with prostitution, the trafficking here is flesh and smut related.

    I doubt most child soliders are raped to break them into killing people or workers raped to work farms, mines and manufacturing but that does happen to women-all the time.

  • @Zain844 Male prostitution is not a major problem, female prostitution is.

  • @Zain844 Actually, its not what hookers do.

    Hookers fuck for money-straight forward business arrangement.

    Golddiggers maniplulate men-often sexually-to get what they want materially.

    The big difference is that men are not in realtionships with hookers but they are involved with golddiggers.

  • @MultiSmartass1 So traffking in humans okay as long as it's not for sex and the victims aren't female?

    Also you failed to answer my question its wrong for a man to hire a prostitute, but what if a woman hires a male prostitute? (or even a female prostitute for that matter)

    Do I sense a double standard here?

    Are you wiling to hold women to the same standard as men?

  • @MultiSmartass1 Interesting, so you are against prostitution because of the traffiking of women.

    You are aware then that traffiking isn't just limited to sex trade, there is traffiking in many industries, (traffking of both men and women) child soldiers, forced labour in manufacturing, forced labour in mines, forced labour in farming, Yet it seems the anti prostitution crowd is only concerned with sex traffking and traffiking only of females

  • @MultiSmartass1 if its a striaght forward business transaction isnt that more honest then?

    most gold diggers have jobs? no they don't actually and if they do they are very low paying jobs a woman wouldnt need a man's money if she had their own

    any woman who feels entitled to have a man provide for her is essentially trading money (or anything else of value ie jewellery)for sex and companionship. That is preciesly what prostitutes do. Morally there is no difference.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more