Fullmetal Alchemist Opening 3 - Atheist Peace

Fullmetal Alchemist Opening 3 - Atheist Peace

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• Fullmetal
• Alchemist
• Opening
• Atheist
• Peace
• Bad
• Religion

[k0reankim]

@JohnnyBlazeGR OH NOW I GET IT! You're trollin me so that I keep commenting and gain publicity for your unpopular vid! Smooth,sir. I was actually starting to lose hope for you, but you had me all along!

[JohnnyBlazeGR]

@k0reankim Bad press is good press, simple concept in media. I never misdirected points I pointed out where you were wrong. I got frustrated with your misconception but I never called you an idiot.

[k0reankim]

@JohnnyBlazeGR I wouldn't be worried about views. You have 1900 views after 3 years and 40% of the people that have rated didn't like your vid anyways. My example is a good one, I'm sorry you didn't grasp the concept. It's when I you don't get the simplest of concepts that I get frustrated and call you dumb. MY BAD. I'm insecure! You're not! But in actuality, your misdirecting points. You shifted the conversation to definition of greek suffixes when I only pointed something diff

[JohnnyBlazeGR]

@k0reankim This is true but comparing sweet and candy isn't the same as comparing this definition. You can't say you're more right unless you know the exact intent of the usage when we're both valid. Also, calling someone dumb doesn't make you smart. It makes you look insecure in your stance. Fact of the matter here is, you're talking in circles, misdirecting points, avoiding others, and riddled with fallacies. You are also giving me a lot of views I wouldn't get if you didn't come back.

[k0reankim]

@JohnnyBlazeGR As you said, the world isn't black and white. If I asked a little kid to define me the word "chocolate" and they said the definition was "sweet" and another said "candy" and another said something like "a candy made from cocoa that tastes sweet," all are correct statements, right? But one might argue some are more correct than others.

[k0reankim]

@JohnnyBlazeGR Both are correct, but from the perspective of a Roman or a Greek, I would suspect mine would be slightly more correct. One can't TRULY know how they used it, because nobody alive today was alive in then. One can only guess how they used it through their literature or sometimes by studying the languages that evolved from those tongues.

[JohnnyBlazeGR]

@k0reankim What makes one definition more right when you're whole argument is a definition can't be exact?How do you know what they meant more than I, if you read the same book written with unclarity.

[JohnnyBlazeGR]

@k0reankim but saying more right implies that my definitions are less correct which contradicts what you just said there. If no one can truly know the first meaning, how can anyone define it clearly?

[k0reankim]

@JohnnyBlazeGR Your inferior mind is showing again. I said MORE right, not absolutely right. I said MORE right because nobody can truly capture the true feeling and meaning the words once meant (because nobody truly knows and because our language limits us from doing so). You really are quite dumb. I'm almost embarrassed for you. I see more and more that you aren't very smart and that your mind is much simpler than I originally thought. I think I'm losing brain cells each time I respond to you.

[JohnnyBlazeGR]

@k0reankim You said "actually more right than yours." No probably there. Also fallacies are self explanatory, what you said IS the explanation of the fallacy. Essentially "he was an expert, so I am".