Re: "We Were Stunned When We Saw This in Michael Moore's Latest Film" — Claire Shipman of ABC News
Loading...
Loading...
244
views
Loading...
Video Responses
This video is a response to "We Were Stunned When We Saw This in Michael Moore's Latest Film" — Claire Shipman of ABC News
Loading...
11:00
Walmart Wants You Dead: How Walmart Screws it's Employees.by DanielGiuditta100,238 views- 1:48
walmart leaves guns on shelf with toysby atlasww85,760 views
- 3:47
Michael Moore: What We're Seeing is the End of Capitalismby mmflint532,353 views
- 1:43
Claire Shipman, threat/secret code words, ABC, 07:19, 9/13by 11septembervideos1,695 views
- 2:51
Hundreds Rally for Single Payer Health Care in Harrisburg, PA Capitol Rotundaby mmflint4,083 views
- 0:48
Michael Moore Presses Hannity on Church Attendanceby newsburghnews23,479 views
- 2:40
Capitalism: A Love Story Movie Review / PopcornReel.comby PopcornReel336 views
- 2:36
Capitalism: A Love Story - Stubs at Hollywood Nights Part 8by DuidlProductions116 views
- 1:23
Claire Shipman on the Work-Life Movementby FWIChannel296 views
- 3:28
Michael Moore's 'Capitalism: A Love Story' - Wal-Mart 'Dead Peasants' Sceneby mmflint72,383 views
- 12:07
Michael Moore on The Sean Hannity Show, Tuesday, October 6th, 2009 (Part I)by mmflint356,616 views
- 6:34
(TLW) Capitalism a Love Storyby WitchesforWellness129 views
- 4:04
"We Were Stunned When We Saw This in Michael Moore's Latest Film" — Claire Shipman of ABC Newsby mmflint230,348 views
- 2:31
dead peasant insurance 2010 track 4 videoby BalloonyTunes241 views
- 2:22
Womenomics - sales conference videoby Collins194752 views
- 5:08
Isagenix Reviewsby jprichards17262,973 views
- 1:15
Jack Welch and Claire Shipman at SHRMby mvndrvrt1,082 views
- 1:37:37
Wal Mart: The High Cost Of Low Price- Full Length Documentaryby mysticdave666110,443 views
- 1:27
Capitalism: A Love Story - Reaction. (200910.02: Day 78)by theroachyjaily445 views
- 6:53
Michael Moore- The Awful Truthby andromedadust100,633 views
@PoliticalWeekly I'm sorry for calling you a moron. Doesn't make your claims right though. I suggest you thoroughly read what Corrosion0wns explained to you, If you don't understand it I'll be happy to explain it in a way that you could.
manuelturcios 7 months ago
@manuelturcios Make a vid response. This world requires you to prove them as morons. You are the moron for calling people moron without a video response.
PoliticalWeekly 7 months ago
WTF did you say? it's moral?!?! I DON"T THINK SO.
privacyvideo4u 9 months ago
corrosion0wns explained it for you, I just wanna say this bit; God forbid entering to an argument with you because well, you're a moron. I don't understand how you call that logic, lol oh man... yeah you're a moron.
manuelturcios 10 months ago
Post #3
The insurance underwriter is also breaking even on a policy worth $10,000, being claimed 5% of the time for a premium of $500. However, they do this on purpose. They receive money today, and have to pay it back at some point in the future. This generates a "float", which they then invest to earn income in the meantime. Insurance underwriters make far more money from investment income on float than they do on policy premiums.
I hope this helps you understand why this is profitable.
Corrosion0wns 2 years ago
Post #2
With that policy, the employer would "break even" on every plan. However, you are right (by sheer luck), that it is the tax system that gives incentive for the employer to do this. The premium paid represents a cost to the company, which it can deduct from its income, lowering its income taxes. In this way, it breaks even on its insurance policies, but "makes money" from reduced taxes.
See post #3 for how the insurance company is actually profiting from a plan that "breaks even".
Corrosion0wns 2 years ago
Here's why you're wrong, and why you dont understand:
Post #1
The employer who purchases the insurance policy is not looking to turn a profit, nor are they planning to have a loss on average, either. The same goes for the insurance underwriter.
If there was a 5% chance an employee dies, and the employer estimated a cost of $10,000 in time and materials for a new hire and training, they should be willing to pay 5% of $10,000 in premiums, equal to $500, on a policy worth $10,000.
Cont'd #2
Corrosion0wns 2 years ago