Dissent Over Descent: Intelligent Design's Challenge to Darwinism, Question time - Clip 3
Loading...
Loading...
606
views
Loading...
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Video Responses
This video is a response to Dissent Over Descent: Intelligent Design's Challenge to Darwinism - Clip 2
Loading...
- 10:00
Dissent Over Descent: Intelligent Design's Challenge to Darwinism - Clip 1by griffgriff78388 views
- 53:12
Steve Fuller: "Modes of Enchantment and Disenchantment in Science: A 21st Century Perspective"by universidaddenavarra1,456 views
- 6:50
Professor Steve Fuller talks about Intelligent Designby universidaddenavarra2,942 views
- 2:36
Ken Miller's missed assumptionby IDquest2,760 views
- 1:56
Famous atheist is stumped - He avoids answering the questionby Oallos1230,158 views
- 5:30
Atheist now accepts Intelligent Designby potholer54168,149 views
- 9:20
HUMAN NATURE ● Prof. Steve Fuller ● Alchemist Cafe Dublin 15th May 2008by DOCUMENTAVi1,586 views
- 7:04
How a Christian should debate an evolutionist!!by kingdmculture7,055 views
- 4:00
The Church Experiment Interview.movby chiefpattysg684 views
- 7:02
Evolution And The Fabled Mutations - THE TRUTHby ppsimmons17,509 views
- 10:48
Anunnaki Secret History on Earthby tolerancethroughknow683,035 views
- 2:42
Atheist questions Darwinism after hearing Kirk Cameronby thewayofthemaster170,470 views
- 23:00
Evidences of Noah's Floodby truthmakesfree33,781 views
- 24:09
TEDxWarwick - Professor Steve Fuller - 2/28/09by TEDxTalks1,416 views
- 6:57
Lesson 14/16: Intelligent Design Part 2by glovergj1,837 views
- 7:45
6. Is Intelligent Design Viable?: William Lane Craig opensby drcraigvideos3,452 views
- 7:51
"Ida" - THE MISSING LINK OR MISSING SCIENCE? - Evolution is falling apart at the seams!by ppsimmons13,364 views
- 3:50
PROOF Dinosaurs lived with man!!!!!!by videofan8852,748 views
- 10:54
Lesson 15/16: Concordism vs. Accommodationby glovergj1,136 views
- 8:06
THE "ANTI-SCIENCE" - The Evolution Delusion! It Is Just NOT Scientific!by ppsimmons7,578 views
Good point about Dawkins' inconsistency. He simultaneously believes that we are nothing by lumbering robots at the mercy of our selfish genes, and also that we have the power to recognise this and defy them. These gung-ho naturalists pride themselves on following 'evidence' - or their assertions of what the facts are 'evidence' for, but they don't seem to consider philosophical consistency very important for some reason. Perhaps because they know they don't have it?
gerontodon 10 months ago
Dr. Steve is right. The basic enhancement of human about science has never been from Darwinian enthusiasism. In fact, it is direct projection of theological enthusiasism into science. Darwinian perspective does the opposite. So why would those dumb peoples trying to segregate science from religion or theological perspective? Get the dumb theory out of text book and sciene development will be better off.
ceparuak 1 year ago
What the woman refers to as "Bad Science" is actually Empiricism. What she refers to as "Good science", is Naturalist Philosophy. And then she goes on that she does not want her children to be confused with the facts, least it might lead them to believe in God. So who exactly is guilty of carrying in a religious viewpoint into the science classroom? The debate between ID and Darwinists can be summarized in one word: "Irony", because Darwinists are more guilty of the things they accuse ID of.
Hannodb1961 1 year ago
Wow, a realist, got to love this guy.
benthemiester 2 years ago
shared beliefs like in religion can encourage social cohesion, creativity and exploration like science. Your comments avoid these facts and go to the extremes. You also seem unable to differentiate use from abuse.
griffgriff78 2 years ago
The Bible has 66 books. Apologetics not APOLOGISTICS simply means a defence of one's position. From the greek word apologia. It is possible to hate something that does not exist materially but exists as a concept even in literature like fairies. It is also possible to express hatred for something by DENYING IT EXISTS in the face of evidence that it really does.
griffgriff78 2 years ago