9/11 Crash Physics - RIP Newton's Laws of Motion (1687-2001)

How to go to Heaven according to the word of the living God: http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/how_to_be_saved.html

Visit my blog at: http://comingworldwar3.wordpress.com

--------- RIP Newton's Laws of Motion (1687-2001) On 9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. Multiple techniques of image manipulation were employed to simulate "airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center". We now have conclusive evidence that the TV networks were proactively complicit in staging this false-flag operation needed to gather public consensus to wage immensely profitable, illegal wars. The forensic analysis of the LIVE TV images leaves no room for doubt : they do not depict authentic imagery nor real airplane crashes but turn out to be entirely doctored video sequences which effectively fooled the worldwide TV audience. Thus, the live broadcasts now stored in the major TV networks' archives, constitute the most solid, verifiable and repeatable proof to expose the falseness of the official version of the 9/11 tragedy. The subsequently released, so-called "amateur" videos were more sophisticated video composites -- yet all have now been exposed for what they are : total forgeries. Most likely, electromagnetic technology (commonly used in war zones (to jam electronic circuitries) prevented any private footage being recorded at the time of the tower strikes. In fact, several electronic disruptions occured in NYC on the day : scores of testimonies reported jammed cellphones and, notoriously, the breakdown of the NYFD firefighters' radio communications was a cause of great concern and outrage. The WTC towers' internal communication system was also inexplicably blacked out. Most on-the-scene witnesses reported a SMALL aircraft of some sort -- not a large 'passenger airliner'. Arguably, what they saw was a winged missile. The 4 purported hijacked flights, as well as the related passenger lists, turn out to have several problems as far as their authenticity is concerned : a long list of documentation (or lack of it) reveal serious discrepancies regarding NTSB, BTS and FAA data. All of the above facts, taken together, suggest that none of the official descriptions of the events are credible. The unescapable fact is that the television images of 9/11 did not depict the real events of that fateful day. The mainstream media's involvement on 9/11 is the unspeakable truth of our times. text by Simon Shack Watch the main movie: 'September Clues" here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pH128xhOsvQ

Category:

Education

Tags:

• 9/11
• 911
• Twin Towers
• Building 7
• World Trade Center
• Airplanes
• Television
• Terrorism
• Government
• Isaac Newton
• Laws of Motion
• 3rd Law of Newton

[newsmanbluesman]

superb - like trying to load my shopping cart with lamp oil and run the cart wrong-way into the buggy corral pipes in the parking lot, rather than use the open end...no matter how hard I ram the cart - with my awesome 40, say - its not going to disappear inside the corral - nor any nose piece come out the far side - right?

[FirstUsedBooks]

@SCREAMFORRELEASE Not sure. Outer shell is closely spaced steel columns, Angle of rotation? If 45 degrees, then height of penetration based on wingspan of 156 ft, is 110.3 ft, which means 11 floors, which means 11 steel truss assemblies, each supporting 4 in of concrete and rebar, horizontally meeting the shell. I'd expect to see deformation at wing ends and tail. Compare with Pentagon where wings are said to have folded back to fit through 16 ft hole.

[Headshothorror4488]

Experts at ae911truth proved demo with physics,FACT

[SCREAMFORRELEASE]

The fact that planes are ergonomically designed in order to cut through air and create lift means that, at such a high speed (in excess of 500mph) the aeroplane could very easy have pierced the outer "shell" of the tower and still maintained it's form until it met a heavier resistance closer to the core of the tower, what you seem to be suggesting here is that the plane should have basically bounced off the building and fallen to the street, kinda like a video game? reality doesn't work like th

[BaruachHaShem]

That explains the latest documentary the firemen said there were plane parts all over the ground, I had never heard that before. Thanks the vail is lifting.

[MrJulesbush]

why fake a plane crashing in a tower? Just put bombs there and tell the people that the bad muslim people planted bombs.

If 9/11 was an inside job and "they" were able to edit every footage of the planes crashing (amateur or tv) they should have the power and knowledge to know that they could be "easily debunked"...

Just get over your stupid "analyses" and "fakery" stuff. For example the famous "Nose in, Nose out": in SepClues the image is heavily altered. They don't look the same at all.

[orlibonurb]

@shadapple So, what about the core central collumns ?! What about all the concrete besides the central collumns ?! It's not the speed that matters, the plane could be flying at 800mph, the resistance found would be the same ammount. I'd suggest you to understand a bit better Newton's laws of motion.

I mean, this video here refutes that very same argument you used, which says: "at least 350 MPH would have sent that thing clear to Brooklyn.".

Anyways, good night brother. Have a good one.

[shadapple]

@orlibonurb I actually just watched it earlier, amazing isn't it? The thing is, if the nose came out like that, just the centrifugal gravity would have made the nose keep going, separated it from the plane, and the nose would have landed half the city away. That far up, at at least 350 MPH would have sent that thing clear to Brooklyn.

[orlibonurb]

@shadapple If you have seen "September Clues", what do you make of the "nose out" thing ? That by itself is incredibly hilarious. Let me know what's your view on that.

I also agree with you on some points, but we must also remember planes are made mostly of aluminum and fiberglass, as we must remember the incredible ammount of steel core columns supporting both of the Twin Towers - as we see the "nose out", then the plane went all the way across the tower encountering no resistance ? lol...

[shadapple]

@orlibonurb Oh, I watched the TV fakery and don't doubt it, I also believe 911 is a lie, and an inside job, but that does not change the fact that glass is glass. You can't just ignore the glass.