Dr J - Lies In Your Biology Textbook Part 1/9

Dr G Charles Jackson of Points of Origins Ministries ( http://www.crossspot.net/origins/ ) examines some of the evolutionary lies in today's biology textbooks.

Part 1 of 9 -- Introduction and Homologous Structures

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Points
• Origins
• Creation
• Science
• Evolution
• Intelligent
• Design
• Lies
• Biology
• Textbook
• Homologous
• Structures
• KlyeJ

[dvs1572]

I should add, scientists do not BELIEVE in evolution. We ACCEPT it because of the enormous pile of data supporting it. Just like we accept that gravity follows an inverse square law, matter is composed of atoms, germs cause disease, and moving electrons constitute electricity. Scientific theories are not a faith. You can test them yourself and falsify them. Do you have faith your computer runs on electrons or do you accept it? Think about it.

[DudorSP]

This guy clearly has no idea of what he's talkin about.

[ukatam]

@DarthServo Hey man, I'm looking through all my old youtube comments and I've pinpointed one of the moments I really started doubting creationism and christianity...just want to say thanks for the education on this particular point. Having been indoctrinated heavily and only hearing a single viewpoint it's not hard to see why I was so ignorant about what evolution really was...but I remember this one stuck with me, why would God create a genome with all the markers of chromosome fusion?

[SqueakerAlpha]

@parasitesarefunny I know what the words mean. They make a non-existant difference in the same process. Perhaps you could tell me the exact mechanism that allows one and prevents the other ? I mean an answer framed as biological science and not goddidit thanks.

[parasitesarefunny]

@SqueakerAlpha

Of course they would disagree, their paycheck & ego is at risk. MICRO evolution is not MACRO Evolution. Please learn what words mean.

[SqueakerAlpha]

@parasitesarefunny evolutionery biologist would disagree. Evolution of new traits is done in the lab all the time. 

[parasitesarefunny]

@dvs1572

roflmao! Macro Evolution FAILS the basics of the scientific method since the ignorant theory cannot be duplicate of predicted. Macro Evolution is based on FAITH that somehow "time" will enable a species to do something that cannot be duplicated or predicted now.

Macro Evolution is a FAITH BASED BELIEF not based on the scientific method.

[DionAFields]

@dvs1572 To say they don't believe in it is nonsense double talk too typical of evolutionist. If they didn't believe in it why would they use it? You either believe or you don't. Wheres the third way in that? It reminds me of trying to pin an evolutionist down on time periods of evolution processes or if its totally random or not. Its so full of holes I'm surprized any scientist worth his/her salt would accept it regardless of creation theorist. Guess money grants talk though.

[DionAFields]

@dvs1572 I do think about gravity can be proved by watching it in action. All science EXCEPT evolution can be proven by watching it in action. EVOLUTION can't be observed and what is called observation in Micro is the equivlent of us forming a callus on our fingers. Would you call a callus on your finger evolution? Your supernatural belief in evolution is astounding to me.

[TheThunderduck]

Here's the deal. "The Catholic church is the biggest financial power, wealth accumulator and property owner in existence. She is a greater possessor of material riches than any other single institution, corporation, bank, giant trust, government or state of the whole globe. The pope, as the visible ruler of this immense amassment of wealth, is consequently the richest individual of the twentieth century. No one can realistically assess how much he is worth in terms of billions of dollars."

[Smackingbuffalo]

@dvs1572 So why do so many scientist not accept it? (Ones that are not Creationist.)

[ThatDamnMegaWorm]

@DudorSP

i know

wht a douche