775HP 434 SB2 SBC BEING DYNO TUNED

THIS IS ONE OF OUR 434 SB2 HEADED 434 RUNNING ON OUR COMPUTERIZED STUSKA DYNO. THIS COMBINATION MAKES 775HP@ 6800RPMS AND 636FT/LBS @ 4800RPMS. IT HAS OVER 600FT/LBS FROM 4500-6300 RPMS, AND DOES IT ALL ON 93 OCTANE PUMP GAS!!! WWW.TIMZEPPENGINES.COM

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• DRAG
• STREET
• S10
• SB2
• NASCAR
• RACE
• DYNO
• POWER

[aminimaleffort]

@madtownmadman

ah, so you have "found that", well, aren't you Ein fucking Stein. the reason that I find you amusing is that I build performance engines 5 days a week and you watch youtube. like most idiots, you do not know that HP and torque exist in a mathematical relationship in which by knowing one you can deduce the other. I am guessing you have grade 9 math and physics. hint, it involves the number 5252

[madtownmadman]

@aminimaleffort I'm not at all surprised that that is all you can come up with. Your reaction would fit right in, if you were a teenager. But you're 42 fucking years old! Its ridiculous that you have come at me this way because I found that the 636 lb-ft of torque that this 434 produces on pump gas, to be stellar. In case you were wondering, thats a shitload of torque for that displacement. Anyone can make huge hp, huge torque is another story. Why don't you look up the definition of illiterate.

[aminimaleffort]

@madtownmadman

how is your daddies 1964 c10 running, did you take your mommies bleach for that burnout?

better go back to your bedroom in their basement, 30 year old wanker. comments on your page makes you

look like a stalker.

[aminimaleffort]

@madtownmadman

torque has nothing to do with compression ratio. I think you learned what little you know from hot rod magazines. 90 year old oil field engines have incredible torque but compression ratios of 6:1 or 7:1, you have a simplified uneducated lack of understanding of stoichiometry and thermodynamics. octane is only part of the solution to detonation, timing and temperature are as important. your writing is near illiterate. you are uneducated.

[madtownmadman]

@aminimaleffort Well please, go ahead and challenge me then. Lets see how mentally fucking retarded I really am. Marian Josephine, have you not gone over your last couple of comments to see the bullshit that your fingers are transmitting to the keyboard? Anyone, reguardless of engine knowledge or the lack therof, could read our last comments and conclude who the "fucktard" was. And I'll tell you what, the fucktard isn't madtownmadman.

[aminimaleffort]

@madtownmadman

you are a fucktard and do not understand the basics of IC engines. you are mentally fucking retarded, compression ratio and torque, haha, funny, "it has to be at least that high....", what a moron. you might want to do some read about rod length and rod length to stroke ratios. energy is not torque.

[madtownmadman]

@aminimaleffort Whats so confusing about what I said? The compression ratio of an engine has everything to do with torque. The more you squeeze the air going into the engine, the more energy the engine will be able to extract from it. All at the expense of the type of fuel that will be used. More comp requires more octane to prevent detonation. I just made a relative guess on 12:1 It has to be at least that high to make that kind of torque. Superb engineering and tuning give this kind of output.

[aminimaleffort]

@madtownmadman

what does CR have to do with torque? 12:1 on 93 octane? are you in grade 8?

[80v8camaro]

what kind of head you using to have all the intake runner separed and all those bolt on valve cover??

[RYENZRO]

BAD ASS!!!!!!!!!!!