New Evidence for 9/11 Drone Attack - 2011 - Were Drones Used??

Please check out 'Xendrius' channel for more content like this. This is his original video and can be found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHHghW4Pg5k

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------­------

"Undeniable new 9/11 DRONE ATTACK PROOF, visual and testimony evidence + proof of bombs"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------­------

Please visit my website @ http://eyesfortheprofane.com for more research & evidence surrounding the false-flag operation "9/11"

Peace&Love
God bless
Chris

Category:

Education

Tags:

• 9/11
• September Clues
• No planes
• Conspiracy Fact
• Truth
• Drones
• New Evidence
• 2011
• 911
• Twin Towers
• Osama bin Laden
• Dead or Alive
• Bombs
• Explosives
• Controlled Demolition
• Thermite
• Thermate
• Military
• New World Order
• Illuminati
• Patriot Act
• Terrorism
• Al Qaeda
• CIA
• NSA
• NRO
• FBI
• Cover up
• Inside Job
• Freedom
• Constitution
• Law
• Love
• Light
• God

[SuperYesyesyo]

0:51 - 0:53 left wing disappears behind the building...so what we see here is the realest of the real planes that hit the WTC

[TheFreedomMinistry]

@SuperYesyesyo "real" might mean something different in your world...

[dwheel39]

The drone theory does not originate from "crazy tin foil hat wearing nuts". In the Northwoods documents, this very idea was proposed by the CIA to the Joint Chiefs under Kennedy. This is THEIR idea. Whether drones were used on 9/11 i don't know. There needs to be a REAL investigation. NOT one led by some of the very suspects themselves.

For those who think the drone theory is nuts, do your research and see where the idea originated..from our government leaders. 

[TheFreedomMinistry]

@dwheel39 Absolutely, well put... thanks for stopping by and checking this out!

Chris

[AlexTronic777]

The entire WTC complex was rigged with explosives, including the base of the towers.

[TheFreedomMinistry]

@AlexTronic777 Sure was *nods*

[TheFreedomMinistry]

@Mutleytech Really now? And how did the towers come down? I'm guessing you believe it was "jet fuel" too? lol

[91vincelakers]

@Eyes4theProfane thank you tell it how it is he's dumb because the towers was made of Steel made of a rare steel just in case the building catch on fire or something crash in the building and the steel would be able to hold the towers up straight and strong but it had to be bombs that made it collapse which made it slint to the side before falling

[91vincelakers]

@AlexTronic777 thats why building 7 was blow up because it had surveillance cameras of a white van pulling up,man in black suites with suite cases planting the bombs in the towers

[Freethequeen1]

fancy forgetting to put logo's on those drone planes !!!

[SuperYesyesyo]

..i wonder why NIST Report didn`t make a test for explosives in the debris..only foreign scientists did but their results are not relevant..cuz everything they found out is just - a coincidence.

[Eyes4theProfane]

@haloforu I love the straw man arguments you make. SCIENCE PROVES THAT NO FIRES COULD HAVE TAKEN DOWN A STEEL STRUCTURE HIGH-RISE BUILDING... EVER... never happened before 9/11, and never happened after (nor will it ever) -- because 9/11 was a FAIRY TALE played out live on CNN, et. al... and the SHEEPLE ate it up!!!! (Hell, I even believed right up until 2006!)

Take a look at my channel content or my website for more information: eyesfortheprofane [d0t] com

Peace&Love

God bless

Chris

[haloforu]

@Eyes4theProfane

Jet fuel can burn at a temperature higher than 900 degrees celsius, which is about 1652 degrees fahrenheit, if I did my math correctly. The fire did not have to melt the beams COMPLETELY. All it had to do was melt it just a bit just so that it could not handle the structural load. I see that you are full on conspiracy, so I will leave you to live in your bunker waiting for the 'government' to kill everyone. Have fun.

[Eyes4theProfane]

@haloforu Sorry, *I do* actually, you do not....

That building was BUILT TO WITHSTAND MULTIPLE BOEING DIRECT HITS (yes, MULTIPLE ON ONE BUILDING ALONE) yet it falls to ONE non-direct HIT!!!

You are easily fooled. I am sorry you still are living in la-la-land, but that's your choice. Ignorance is bliss, as they say....

Peace&Love

God bless

Chris

[haloforu]

@Eyes4theProfane

You obviously do not know how old the materials were to hold that building up, and you OBVIOUSLY dont know how hot the fuel from that plane burns at. The fire would have EASILY melted the exterior beams of the tower, causing them to buckle when they are over-heated.The buckling led to floors falling in on one another, causing the building to collapse. My friends family was on the 2nd jet.. they were NOT military.

[MrNoblemanoflove]

Hijackers Trained A U.S. Bases 1min 30sec

Wargames on 9/11: (sub-clip) Dick Cheney ran the wargames? 3min 19sec

[Eyes4theProfane]

@haloforu You, unfortunately (because we need all the people we can get to wake the fuck up and help us restore this country from the hostiles who have turned it out from within like a good working girl), are the dumbass for believing NIST & the other criminal groups that were formed by Bush & Co. to cover-up 9/11. You should be ashamed of yourself for lying so blatantly as well. You know damn well that the building didn't collapse do to structural damage or fire, use your fuckin head.