Uploader Comments (Desertphile)
Top Comments
-
"Change in any living creature comes from loss of information rather than new info added.Things started out perfect!"
Tell that to this ribozyme evolution experiment.
watch?v=SDNnV6uqxZk
-
What the fuck is a 'lucy lover?'
All Comments (146)
-
LOL Such retards. They shouldnt be saying complex systems are proof of god but SIMPLE systems are proof of a designer. As any programmer, industrial designer, architect will tell you - its simple that is designed well - not complexity.
-
Recipe for oil. Take 5 billion failed fallen ruined superstitious faithtards. Have them smoke the tailpipe of a running automobile for 20 minutes, bulldoze into the huge pit made from underground nuclear (nookular if from Texas) weapons tests, cover pit with Bibles and Korans. let simmer for 1 million years. Refine, pump into tank and go for a Sunday drive. What a great way to celebrate when god concept (fill in name) took a break from winking into existence the entire universe. Thank you! :)
-
I've seen some nasty genetic defects. Imagine if a defect started the eye. Its totally possible
-
your reading from at sign... you suc k
-
I think the clitoris is irreducibly complex.
-
mutations happen all the time between generations. If a mutation is really detriment it will die maybe even before birth, hence it will not reproduce.
If a mutation makes the speciment a retard it will not live for long enough to procreate, it will not reproduce.
If a mutation is mildly negative or neutral it will have a chance to reproduce.
If the enherited mutations are positive it will have higher chance than average to reproduce.
The process is blind but obviously work. Simple enough?
you know whats funny. even Darwin admitted that natrural selection doesnt account for everything that he observed in his travels and studies. all final analysis are based on human error and relative perspective. this is inescapable. all things are most likely infinite so both atheists and chriatians have groundless arguements
runelord37 2 years ago
That is correct, and Charles Darwin was 100% right: natural selection does not account for the diversity of life on Earth.
Desertphile 2 years ago