President Eisenhower 1953 Inaugural Address

http://www.c-spanarchives.org/library/vidLink.php?b=600969171&e=600970421...

President Eisenhower delivered his first inaugural address on January 20, 1953.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• C-SPAN

[kvnd7331]

my great grandfather shook hands with him when he came home from ww2

[RonocDondra352]

We could use Ike back in the White House...and he would have handled Nam better - actually if he had been in office there wouldn't have been a war in Vietnam.

[siriusstar10000]

Good video .I've added it to my favorites

[Zachw2007]

@Socracea Who cares about trivial issues like that in Eisenhower's life, presidency and military leadership. Ike was great for America and the West in general. Is god real or not? I hope so; however, I don't know for sure and don't pretend to. I love Ike and like, for example, Andrew Jackson, Grover Cleveland, U.S. Grant, and others was a great leader and did good for our country. That's my point. I don't want to debate biblical issues. My position is in the first 2 or 3 sentences.

[Harrysong100]

I like Ike

[Socracea]

@theCuno100 Well - I consider ALL religions POISON TO THE BRAIN. I don't weigh one worse than the other.

[Socracea]

@theCuno100 Oh - and the whole "something comes from nothing" argument... If you pose that argument, please recall that - that is EXACTLY what you believe - that your imaginary God 'CREATED' everything from nothing... abiogeneisis (translated = how things came to be) is not the topic here... he topic is that you adhere to a doctrine prescribed by bronze-age humans who claim to write a book that is 'supposedly' written by 'God'

[Socracea]

@theCuno100 Actually - if you read ANY of the things I have said... I have not been 'abrasive', I simply find it comically ignorant that people in the 21st century actually subscribe to archaic beliefs.. JUST BECAUSE YOUR PARENTS TOLD YOU TO DO SO... Think for yourself... weigh the evidence and study the books... I do not put one religion against another... they are all bullshit...

[DeniabilityPlausible]

@Socracea I will have to say that Soc has a point. Not unlike other theists, all I see in this lovely little thread are personal attacks on people who do not subscribe to the theistic mentality. When called on their points, they result to distraction tactics. Interesting. Oddly enough that 93% of the accredited intellectuals in the US are atheists...

[Socracea]

@theCuno100 "BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE - as far as your point about my lack of a 'Youtube presence..' I did not feel the need to actually post on this medium until I saw some postings that I could actually challenge and respond to. Since when does it matter how many 'posts' I have? Really? That makes your others posts even more laughable (not that they needed help in sounding ignorantly ridiculous)...

[Socracea]

@theCuno100 REALLY? That is all you can retort with? A video I made for fun when I bought my latest technology toy? I find that blatantly hysterical. And - for the record, we do not have our 'religious differences'... You are religious, therefore you are delusional... PLEASE remember that point, as it is my point to your embracing something you were weened on as a child, based on a fictional book, and embraced by another delusional majority because they had the same thing happen to them...