Talk given at Tokyo University October 5, 2009. This is a plea for scientists to be skeptical about presumptions about how IP should regulate it, and a bit about the work (the GREAT work) of Science Commons in this space.
Thank you for this input, it truely helps me to re-understand why I am writing my LL.M. final thesis on "Orphan works. Towards an international workable solution". To question how (c) works limiting the access to works, w/o any benefit at all. I already quoted your works a few times in this matter...
Just to point out here, the reason that non-lawyers are commonly deferential to the law is that they commonly are not in a position to gauge if a law is good or not. People in general defer to experts. In this case, they defer to lawyers.
Thank you for this input, it truely helps me to re-understand why I am writing my LL.M. final thesis on "Orphan works. Towards an international workable solution". To question how (c) works limiting the access to works, w/o any benefit at all. I already quoted your works a few times in this matter...
djrsterenborg 2 years ago
Great talk, as always.
AtheistAntitheist 2 years ago
so happy to see another video uploaded!! it had been so long.. i'll have to finish watching it later though, not enough time for it all right now :)
sisforshayla 2 years ago
Just to point out here, the reason that non-lawyers are commonly deferential to the law is that they commonly are not in a position to gauge if a law is good or not. People in general defer to experts. In this case, they defer to lawyers.
SeventhCycle 2 years ago