Global Warming Hoax, Planned in 1961

Politicisation has become a real problem, no doubt.
One groups still trying to fuck the other over tho by use of sympathetic media organisations and other tricks that we have seen ( conolley wiki etc).

I dont concur with your analysis.
Because climate changes continually and its arrogant and meddlesome to to have the conceited belief that we can hold the planet to no more than 2 degrees of warming.
Tell it to Sol.

The Consensus dosent exist, theres too many who disagree with you.

@ Dorothy Allerion,
Maybe the Scarecrow is a better fit than Dorothy for you, since you have no brains.
How's that Right vs Left fantasy working out for you? As good as your Marxist Cult leaders magical cure without treating the disease?

Keep following the yellow brick road, but wait your constrained at the present

1984
Choo Choo

The UOIACRC announced this relating to the spam you just spewed.
"..our data shows that on February 15, 1979, global sea ice area was 16.79 m sq. km and on February 15, 2009, global sea ice area was 15.45 m sq. km. Therefore, global sea ice levels are 1.34 m sq. km less in February 2009 than in February 1979. This decrease in sea ice is equal to the area of Texas, California, and Oklahoma combined.
It is disturbing that the WaPo would publish such information without first checking the facts."

Marsh is neck-deep in the oil swamp of the NCPPR, a festering propaganda tool of the oil barons and propped up by the hardcore Denierborg's like Olin, Scaife and all the other Wing-nut happy-clappers who are currently praying for gullible, stupid "useless idiots" to allow their continued looting of the planet.

Will you oblige them ? I think you will.

Reid Btyson also said this; " I'm not skeptical about global warming. It's occurring. The question is, what is the human hand in this? Back in 1968, I gave a talk at the AAAS [American Association for the Advancement of Science] suggesting that people could change the climate a little bit, and I was laughed off the platform."
He was unfortunately out of the loop with most of the recent advances in climate science, and the Deniers leached out what remained of his vital sap before he died.

@Tacair
The whole issue has become so politicized that exaggerations are common on both sides of the debate, but the REAL problem is still there, and ALL the science points towards AGW being a very real concern in the VERY real future, in OUR generation.

I just want people to TRAP. To research and think.
You'll see that ALL the Deniers are linked, and they NEED a drone army of clueless tools, and they'd do anything to get it.

There is, also, real consensus on AGW, and you can't deny this

@allieron

I think the 30,000 numbers a bit hyped personally.

I do know theres some issues with some of the signatories with silly names being used by some, but id hold off on saying it "was warmists wot done it".... :D

There are still a rather large number of scepticalscientists who have signed it, which tends to blow the "we have consensus" proclamation right out the water.

Still, the ipcc is using names that have requested to be removed as the final draft wasnt what they signed...fraud.

@beggarz

On the nail!

@BaronVonLichtenstein

I cant still believe our rotten government decreed it had to be shown in shools- Fucking indoctrination!
Just like the Nazis with their Hitler youth.

If i ever found out that they tried to show such blatant propagand to my kids, well, there would not be a pleasant outcome for them.

Fortune magazine won a Science Writing Award from the American Institute of Physics for its analysis of the danger. It announced in February 1974: As for the present cooling trend a number of leading climatologists have concluded that it is very bad news indeed. It is the root cause of a lot of that unpleasant weather around the world and they warn that it carries the potential for human disasters of unprecedented magnitude.