Trans Am Vs 5.4 Swapped 99 Gt

Trans Am, bolt ons, vs h/c/i 5.4 swapped 99 Mustang gt with built rear end

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• Trans
• am
• Mustang

[sn95guy13]

mustang has a 5.4 lightning motor in it, not supercharged, has heads cams and intake, gears exhuast, tko tranny and a few other mods with a 150 shot, not spraying this run, the trans am is a auto with 3500 stall and lid, went 12.7 with just those mods

[sn95guy13]

its a motor from a ford f150 lightning, but with the blower removed, heads and cams, made 335 rwhp all motor. it had a bottle it sprayed after and walked hard, but didnt get the vid

[kingcobra101z]

Yeah I know what you mean, take for example the 302. Stoke it to a 347 and slap vic jr. heads on it and presto! GM's nightmare from the 1980s is back for another ass kicking. GM guys know their shit, Ford guys know their shit, I TRY to know everyones shit.

[tribalstang]

You anywhere near Dallas. I have an 02 Mustang GT. I know Its just a tiny little shitstang, but I would LOVE to race your almighty BADASS WS6! I just HOPE that you will stoop low enough to race my weak little shit stang. How bout it? We can even video tape you KICKIN MY ASS for the whole world to see....you in?

[plane45036]

even with a 5.4 the mustang still fails, Not a surprise though, Give it up ford fans, Unless you have a mustang 5.0 with some nitrous and h/c/i setup or a 2011 mustang...or 03/04 cobra, you fail...

[NomadGT]

@testy462 I haven't seen anything about changing internals. If the mods that are listed is it on a lightning motor than that is the CR he would have. I would hope that he was with it enough to at least put in rods and pistons with a smaller dish.

[testy462]

@NomadGT why would he have a 8.4:1 CR? Sure as heck isn't stock and you wouldn't set it up for that with a nitrous car like this one.

[NomadGT]

@testy462 built??? heads and cams isnt going to greatly change the 8.4:1 CR, its like kicking a chubby kid with down.

[testy462]

@sn95guy13 a lS1 auto with a lid and stall beat a built 5.4L?

What happened here, total driver fail?

[1962Galaxie514ciMPFI]

@Texarmageddon yo i understand where your coming from but remember its about how much air nd fuel you put in the chambers of each cylinder along with compression, i run ported pi heads for street 4.6s nd 5.4s, look at a few 4.6l 2v articles in mustang mags look under 2v 4.6l with ported pi heads nd pi intake there making up to 410/390 at crank N/A nothing else, now put a stroker in it, yeah i see 298s rape 350s 351s 302s alot. thats nice power. just bolt ons 5.4s will hit 480 easily

[Texarmageddon]

@1962Galaxie514ciMPFI The guy above is talking about the 4.6 2v.. 5.4 are good... but a 4.6 2v?... come on now...

[1962Galaxie514ciMPFI]

@Texarmageddon actually you can put 394/410 to ground with a 5.4l 2v i have one in my 02 stang, all motor no baby bottle or squeeze. its all in how the engine is built. of course a 3v would rape 2vs with similar work done, as far as walking on f-bodies go well i walk on vettes nd 2011 5.0s. but id rather have a 5.4l 4v fuck 3vs nd 2vs oh btw thats with 10.4:1 compression 93 pump gas

[1962Galaxie514ciMPFI]

@Texarmageddon actually you can put 394/410 to ground with a 5.4l 2v i have one in my 02 stang, all motor no baby bottle or squeeze. its all in how the engine is built. of course a 3v would rape 2vs with similar work done, as far as walking on f-bodies go well i walk on vettes nd 2011 5.0s. but id rather have a 5.4l 4v fuck 3vs nd 2vs

[probercr93]

I don't understand why he would do a 5.4 low comp. motor out of a lightning and take the blower off unless he's planning on throwin a turbo at it. The 4.6 in this car with h/c/i would make 335 hp easy. And the bottom end in the lightning motor is weak. If you're going to swap a 5.4 grab a nav. 4v n have some fun!