Ron Wyatt 1988 Part 1 of 6

A 1988 interview with the late Ron Wyatt discussing Noah's Ark, the Ark of the Covenant and more.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Noah's Ark
• the Ark of the Covenant
• Bible
• Jesus
• God
• evidence
• Proof
• Ron
• Wyatt
• 1988

[JohnAThornton]

How in the world could elephants negotiate a downward descent on the almost vertical wa;;s of a high mountain? Absolutely mpossible! That fact is but one reason any reasonable person would know that Noah's Ark would and could not have come to rest on Mt. Arat, proper. A boat looks like a boat, whether sitting (or buried) on dry land or floating on water (or sitting on the bottom of the ocean. Do you get the picture?

[HolyRevelation]

@JohnAThornton I never said that everyone must believe Ron, that up to them.

I'm showing people Rons evidence, never said it was 100% proof of Noah's Ark.

To answer your question about elephants negotiating an almost vertical downward descent.

Mountains can grow higher over time, maybe around the time of the flood, Mt. Arat wasn't so tall.

[HolyRevelation]

When Evolutionists attempt to eliminate the supernatural God, they must attribute Gods supernatural attributes to the universe. Instead of believing in a super, intelligent, creative God, they believe in a super, intelligent, creative universe.

Evolution is form of eastern, Hindu, mysticism disguised as science.

[ma049]

@JohnAThornton In regard to Ron Watson's common sense. You credit him with looking for Noah's Ark on Ararat. And lo what happens Ron discovers the Ark in the very spot he looks. I think you should look up the term confirmation bias. Ron wants an Ark on Ararat so Ron gets one, even if it is just rock formation that looks vaguely ship like. I

[ma049]

@JohnAThornton The idea that Archeologist would NOT investigate compelling evidence of a giant bronze ship is ludicrous. Don't trust me, look up the number and range of different phd's submitted by archeology post grads and you will see that they are covering a lot if basis. The idea that not a single archeologists can be prevailed upon to study what would be the greatest discovery in the history archeology is silly.

[NorthForkFisherman]

@HolyRevelation Interesting point you touch on there. Orogeny, I mean. In fact it's these very processes that directly rule out a global flood as per a literal reading of Genesis. The amount of heat released as clearly documented by the chemcial composition of the Earth's crust completely rules out the flood. A LOCAL flood? Yeah, sure. There's data that supports that. Happens all the time, and stories do get bigger in the retelling. Global? No way.

[waketheoblivious]

@JohnAThornton

I get the picture better then you can possibly imagine. Image the overhead architectual view of a boat. Now, consider that view and know the timber frame fall away from center by design. Outwards, and for sake of imagery can use a wireframe in your imagination. The image would vaguely resemble a boat, but that is the image is created by the remnants of ancient vessels. Expand the Biblical measurements to adapt to an outwardly collapsed frame. Wyatt found Noah's Ark

[JohnAThornton]

@HolyRevelation Whoa NELLIE!! I''m with you 100%, Ron Wyatt was a man after God's own heart, and God reciprocated by giving him more good old common sense than a 10 mile long freight train can haul. Noah's Ark is right where God left it. He showed Ron where it was, and provided the means to get there. The Ark was never "lost", the "scientific" community just didn't have sense enough to know where to look and mostly refused to look in the most logical place of all, "the MOUNTAINS of ARAT"

[joebarniak]

The end is closer than we think my friends. There are already plans for taxation of churches. I hope everyone sees the truth and chooses to make a decision.