Search "pascals wager" or "rebutting pascals wager" and you will see how wrong you are. But that doesn't mean that I care what you think... and I wasn't here to change your mind... just state mine.
Well this is my video, my beliefs, so if you come to me with "points" I will respond when I have the chance. I have nothing to loose, and by following saints and scriptures of India, I also have nothing to loose. ANd if they are all correct, then I have everything to gain.
I am familiar with the tale, I would consider the message the same regardless. May we leave the conversation at this? Seeing as how we have both seemed to clearly state our positions... it would seem unnecessary to add pointless length to an already month+ long debate (given how your schedule seems to prevent you from accessing your YouTube account with much frequency).
Hiranyakashipu is actually an eternal servant of God who desired to serve God in VEERA ras, (the nectar of chivalrous fighting) Hiranyakashipu was a gate keeper in Vaikuntha. Hiranyakashipu became the enemy of Vishnu, but when he discovered his son to be a devotee, he tried to destroy his own son. (all part of the pastime to bring the lord down for a good fight)
"He didn't commit any crime and yet his father tried in many ways to kill him" - I'm afraid this goes to prove my point, such actions don't exactly leave you with the opinion "Hey, that Hiranyakashipu is a stand-up guy!"
Actually it is viceversa. Prahlad was a five year old boy whose only fault was that he had an attraction to God. He didn't commit any crime and yet his father tried in many ways to kill him. Prahlad respected his atheistic father as well.
I hope I have enunciated my point in an understandable manner, and please note that my intention was not to infuriate you (although I clearly have, I apologize), but merely to respond to what I felt was the clear and present message of the tales of Prahlad.
Best wishes,
remember the nameless quote-
"Where we are going is not nearly as important as how we get there"
when one ponders on how to deal with one's neighbor.
So why do you want me to know what is in your mind. I never asked.
SuChandrakanta 2 years ago
Search "pascals wager" or "rebutting pascals wager" and you will see how wrong you are. But that doesn't mean that I care what you think... and I wasn't here to change your mind... just state mine.
IhaveNoCreativity 2 years ago
Well this is my video, my beliefs, so if you come to me with "points" I will respond when I have the chance. I have nothing to loose, and by following saints and scriptures of India, I also have nothing to loose. ANd if they are all correct, then I have everything to gain.
SuChandrakanta 2 years ago
I am familiar with the tale, I would consider the message the same regardless. May we leave the conversation at this? Seeing as how we have both seemed to clearly state our positions... it would seem unnecessary to add pointless length to an already month+ long debate (given how your schedule seems to prevent you from accessing your YouTube account with much frequency).
IhaveNoCreativity 2 years ago
Hiranyakashipu is actually an eternal servant of God who desired to serve God in VEERA ras, (the nectar of chivalrous fighting) Hiranyakashipu was a gate keeper in Vaikuntha. Hiranyakashipu became the enemy of Vishnu, but when he discovered his son to be a devotee, he tried to destroy his own son. (all part of the pastime to bring the lord down for a good fight)
SuChandrakanta 2 years ago
"He didn't commit any crime and yet his father tried in many ways to kill him" - I'm afraid this goes to prove my point, such actions don't exactly leave you with the opinion "Hey, that Hiranyakashipu is a stand-up guy!"
IhaveNoCreativity 2 years ago
Actually it is viceversa. Prahlad was a five year old boy whose only fault was that he had an attraction to God. He didn't commit any crime and yet his father tried in many ways to kill him. Prahlad respected his atheistic father as well.
SuChandrakanta 2 years ago
dont bother with them.......these non-
anythings,,,,,they are not worth the
ground they stand on...
jpandyaraja 2 years ago
I hope I have enunciated my point in an understandable manner, and please note that my intention was not to infuriate you (although I clearly have, I apologize), but merely to respond to what I felt was the clear and present message of the tales of Prahlad.
Best wishes,
remember the nameless quote-
"Where we are going is not nearly as important as how we get there"
when one ponders on how to deal with one's neighbor.
IhaveNoCreativity 2 years ago