esperanto
Top Comments
All Comments (71)
-
Of course english is universal, because it's so advertised everywhere. However, it takes years to speak proper english for someone who's not a native speaker. For some people takes decades to be somehow fluent, while Esperanto took me around 3 months to learn and speak fluently. Saluton!
-
Okay. Uh... the guy on the right asked what the guy on the left's name was, right?
-
Ĉi tio timegigas min...
-
saluton, kaj bonvenon
-
@abrahampetit I disagree with your claim that Esperanto will fail because it is not based on a Germanic language. English is my first language and Spanish was EASY for me to learn. It's way more consistent than English. So, if Esperanto is easy for Spanish speakers... Well... you do the math to know what I'm saying.
-
@ositoster "...some french, but very little."
English is indeed a Germanic language, but to say it was only influenced by French a little is inaccurate. In fact a large portion of the English vocabulary is etymologically French, including the words "etymology", "large", "portion" and "language". English also has a LOT of words from Latin. Actually, English is probably the closest a non-Romance language can come to being a Romance language.
-
@haltensie Dude, english is NOT a romance language. English comes from german mostly, the only latin influence it's some french, but very little. Spanish, Catalan, Portuguese, Italian, French... these are romance languages.
-
What they say? XD - Want it to my project in my school in 2 days, and I really don't know what they say...
-
@SlayTheZombies Because it's easier than English speaking. :P
-
that's funny, esperanto sounds NOTHING like english, therefore it's a bust for me.
via nomo estas jim ankaux????????
ariboreal 1 year ago 8
Tre bona!
slobodan12346 2 years ago 7