Tiger vs Lion. Rant Tiger always won in Rome as records show to limited intelligence Jorvens.

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,835
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Ratings have been disabled for this video.

Uploaded by on Aug 20, 2009

http://www.pbs.org/edens/bhutan/a_tiger.htm
Ok I'm sure everyone has seen the new foreign translater users retarded lionfans and retarded children lionfans still in diapers. Well Theres a limited intelligence fat man named Jorvens, whose lies, fantasies, hypocritical ways, projecting ways, bs, made up crap, is unreal. An I gave this walrus his time without responding but I feel I must make a few videos. This is a rant displaying the tigers dominance in rome, in which all sources and records state this. He's beyond the stupidest person posting in this debate I've ever seen. ALl records and evidence show the tiger as the winner. Even the readings on the roman walls and artifacts show the tiger as the winner in rome, and written records. His responce I swear I'm not kidding people, Lion statues. DId you hear me lion statues! There are tons of tiger statues, frog statues, what the hell? There are tigers all over Roman literature, and artifacts, the walls and all over romes history. An what's funny is he uses statues of like no relavance to rome. Just decoration modern statues, it's beyond funny, it's like me showing frog figurines and saying that's the reason it always beat the lion in ROme. What is this nut on?????? Lmao. This fat boy kidding? There are millions of statues of all animals idiot all over, your statues have nothing to do with rome idiot. I can make a video 100 minutes long of nothing but statues, and reading of the walls, and tigers in Rome idiot. But that still has little do with the winner. The winner is written on documents and well known. The tiger always defeated the lion in rome as every source modern and roman times states this. A million books state this, It's a common fact goon. The tigers used were Caspian/Siberian tigers primarily. Then you use in your video 1600 through 1900 paintings of circuses of lions and tigers make belief childrends what does that have to do with Rome moron? Circus paintings wtf dude???? Anyways I will get to that subject in my next video when I fry you alive about Rome. You showed absolutely nothing against the 100% evidence in favor of the tiger in Rome, fat clown.

All Comments

Adding comments has been disabled for this video.

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more