Guns N Roses performing Better live at The Download Festival, Sunday 11th June 2006. Axl Roses most energetic performance in years.
UPDATE:
Just had an email from youtube telling me UMG have claim...
Guns N Roses performing Better live at The Download Festival, Sunday 11th June 2006. Axl Roses most energetic performance in years.
UPDATE: Just had an email from youtube telling me UMG have claimed copyright on the audio from this video a have hda to remove it, so i've replaced it with something a little more fitting, enjoy!
2ND UPDATE: For some who doubt that I even have the original audio to this video (even though I filmed it myself) here is a image of the email I recieved from youtube...
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
If you turned up at a live concert and recorded this yourself:
UMG does not own either the visual footage nor the audio track - You do !
UMG has no legal basis upon which to make any copyright claim any more than if you recorded it as a cover with your own band playing the song and uploaded it to YouTube.
I'm not saying I had one. I'm just saying it was probably illegal to film this. What I don't understand is why they take off an ametuer recording like this but you can listen to the whole album on myspace.
Intellectual property law and copyright law are a bitch to navigate. Youtube airs on the side of caution and takes any potential trouble away. The only way that this could be reversed is if some kind of defence was made under the Youtube rules of fair usage. However, as the entire audio and video was posted in its entirety (not clips used as part of a larger video) it wouldn't stick. Most record companies aren't so anal about bootlegs though :)
UMG still owns the rights to the distribution of a material that they own the copyright for.
"UMG has no legal basis upon which to make any copyright claim any more than if you recorded it as a cover with your own band playing the song and uploaded it to YouTube." - This is an inaccurate statement. Allow me to provide precedent: WMG pulled the audio to ALL covers of any material by Prince. Even just guys doing bedroom covers. Their copyright, they can do what they want with it.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
UMG does not own either the visual footage nor the audio track - You do !
UMG has no legal basis upon which to make any copyright claim any more than if you recorded it as a cover with your own band playing the song and uploaded it to YouTube.
"UMG has no legal basis upon which to make any copyright claim any more than if you recorded it as a cover with your own band playing the song and uploaded it to YouTube." - This is an inaccurate statement. Allow me to provide precedent: WMG pulled the audio to ALL covers of any material by Prince. Even just guys doing bedroom covers. Their copyright, they can do what they want with it.
Without videos, nobody would believe it.
UMG probably thinks the sales on his latest album fell off a cliff due to P2P rather than it being a mishmash of suck.