Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Guns N Roses - Better (Download 2006) AUDIO REMOVED BY UMG!

Guns N Roses performing Better live at The Download Festival, Sunday 11th June 2006. Axl Roses most energetic performance in years. UPDATE: Just had an email from youtube telling me UMG have claim...  
 
Customize

More From: salutethefallen

Loading...

QuickList(0)

378 ratings
Sign in to rate
261,750 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (1)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (613)   Options

Loading...
youkid1991 (3 months ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
then delete the whole video.
19grand (4 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
cant here anything even an overdub
Keruaran (4 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
If you turned up at a live concert and recorded this yourself:

UMG does not own either the visual footage nor the audio track - You do !

UMG has no legal basis upon which to make any copyright claim any more than if you recorded it as a cover with your own band playing the song and uploaded it to YouTube.
dudemanguyguy (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
That doesn't mean it was legal for him to film it. Most band concerts have a no filming policy.
Keruaran (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Show me a legal basis upon which UMG can claim footage you filmed yourself is their property.
MontyAwesome (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I'm not saying I had one. I'm just saying it was probably illegal to film this. What I don't understand is why they take off an ametuer recording like this but you can listen to the whole album on myspace.
sdmf1982 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Intellectual property law and copyright law are a bitch to navigate. Youtube airs on the side of caution and takes any potential trouble away. The only way that this could be reversed is if some kind of defence was made under the Youtube rules of fair usage. However, as the entire audio and video was posted in its entirety (not clips used as part of a larger video) it wouldn't stick. Most record companies aren't so anal about bootlegs though :)
sdmf1982 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
UMG still owns the rights to the distribution of a material that they own the copyright for.

"UMG has no legal basis upon which to make any copyright claim any more than if you recorded it as a cover with your own band playing the song and uploaded it to YouTube." - This is an inaccurate statement. Allow me to provide precedent: WMG pulled the audio to ALL covers of any material by Prince. Even just guys doing bedroom covers. Their copyright, they can do what they want with it.
eskikasar (5 months ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
Video evidence that Axl DOES occasionally show up for gigs.

Without videos, nobody would believe it.

UMG probably thinks the sales on his latest album fell off a cliff due to P2P rather than it being a mishmash of suck.
IllegalOfficialBand (6 months ago) Show Hide
+5
Marked as spam
"You downloading mutherf*ckers?!" - Axl Rose. He actually said this in this concert.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.