hey idiot, the angle of the camera is what makes it appear to bounce in front of the line. the linesman and hawkeye both got it correct. its clearly out.
Hawkeye can't be wrong. If you claim otherwise, then you're actually challenging the laws of physics, as Hawkeye is based solely on the projectile motion of physics.
@voodooros wait no. Hawk eye is not a exact technology. It "predicts" by highest probabilities the course of the ball.
mrkauffman 1 month ago
its clearly out at 1:15. get some glasses bro.
tennisfan81 2 months ago
hey idiot, the angle of the camera is what makes it appear to bounce in front of the line. the linesman and hawkeye both got it correct. its clearly out.
tennisfan81 2 months ago
Hawkeye can't be wrong. If you claim otherwise, then you're actually challenging the laws of physics, as Hawkeye is based solely on the projectile motion of physics.
voodooros 2 months ago