Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Gauntlet Thrown, Gauntlet Taken - The Ultimate Nephilim Debunkage [1/3]

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,064
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 21, 2010

I am so hungover right now...

Anyway Nephilim replied with 4 A4 sides worth of bullshit and fucktardery, so this is the first part of my response! Enjoy.

Part 2 should be done by next week, maybe

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Ainulindale21)

  • And surely by now, you have heard Nephy use the word 'morphology.'

    Morphology is "FORM AND STRUCTURE... form and structure... Not form OR structure... form AND structure." He'll say it exactly like that.

    He says morphological change is seen only if both form and structure have changed. Forget basic logic or your brain will hurt.

    Therefore, dogs and wolves are not morphologically different.

    He will assert that he is using "your" definition of 'morphology,' too.

    Ug.

  • Then he will also need to explain how a wolf and a lion are morphologically different to the same standard :)

    Obviously he won't, he's as mentally stubborn as a donkey glued to it's own arse

  • @Ainulindale21 I have recently seen a video that says that -- using NephilimFree's definition of 'morphology' -- all mammalian species are morphologically identical.

    Yep -- Humans and bats have no morphological differences (using NF's definition). Oh, wait... Are bats mammals? My bible says they are birds.

  • hehe, indeed. I mentioned bats and rhino's in the last vid bearing the same skeletal composition, I intend to do a full vid on the topic at some point

  • May I mirror this on the Demonarchives channel?

  • sure, go for it :)

Top Comments

  • @shadow12613

    Time to spread the word so that this guy gets more subs.

  • "Your doubt is unreasonable as is your face"

    Brilliant

see all

All Comments (57)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You know when creationists say that information must come from a mind, show them the butterfly alphabet.

    .butterflyalphabet. com/main/images/BA2.jpg

    Even with their absurd definition of information, the fact that every letter and number have been found on butterfly wing must show that information can occur spontaneously. Either that or God is painting them on individually.

  • firtly? alright, what the hell.

    my spelling and grammar, sucks, I;m honest about that. And yes I make stupid mistakes.

    But compaired to nephie, I'm the spelling and grammar master.

    congratulations nephie, your worst than the worst.

  • @ArcasDevlin This is actually a good question. As Evolution is a continuous process it's hard to tell when a new species arises. The definition of a species is still under debate. Even different dogs can be seen as different species as they can't naturally reproduce.

  • I re-watched that part, and I think I do understand the point now.

    I'm still becoming accustomed to the speed at which you speak.

  • Isn't one species different from another because they can't breed and have both male and female offspring that can also breed?

    Can't both male and female wolf-dogs breed? If this is the case, aren't dogs just domesticated breeds of wolf rather than a separate species?

    If I am inaccurate, this does not surprise me. I'm not anti-evolution or a theist, and I'm not using this as an argument. I'm just curious.

    Or perhaps it was a different point that you were trying to make that I missed.

  • One more thing while the buzz in kicking in. My whiskey almost didn't get past my esophagus because of this: 2:01 - 2:06.

    I don't know if I should thank you for what seems to be the best laugh I've had in a while or be extremely angry at you for almost making me spill the good whiskey.

    Anyway on with the show.

  • Man I got hooked on your channel as soon as I saw the bit in your first video where you said:

    ''Thanks Richard!'' and out pops a googly eyed Dawkins staring at his own book!

    and let's not forget:

    ''... because fuck a duck Nephilim, this makes about as much sense as Belgium eating it's own face.''

    Pure Gold!

    Funny, I was just finishing up a the first half of a bottle of Tennessee's finest 31 seconds into this video.

    Absolutely nothing to not like about your work good sir.

    Cheers!

  • Holy shit! You are the funniest man on youtube.

  • @genericmember1 i think not! don't ever leave beautiful tear-strewn landscape because of a rotten old bat. you tell that hag to fuck right off.

  • @325982668 This is true. Anne Widdecombe is just an intolerable person. If she ever came to live in Birmingham, I think that would be my cue to move.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more