Full Body X-Ray Scanners in Melboune Airports

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
20,221
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 23, 2008

Sky News reports on this invasive technology being trialled in Melbournes domestic airport.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • "Hi, can you NOT expose my entire body to X-radiation while I'm just trying to board a plane? yeah, thanks"

  • you know whats really funny?

    My dad's an airline pilot and he gets nail clippers taken off him, when he asks why they say incase you try to take control of the aeroplane, isnt that what hes supposed to do?

    He could crash the plane at any time so taking stuff off him is pointless

see all

All Comments (51)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • RAPESCAN SYSTEMS. An OSI systems company.... for your safety

  • The imaging machines are unfortunate abused, internal images are very detailed "public" images are fuzzy. The true dose to skin, testicles and breast about 1/20 to 1/50 of a chest x-ray, and machines are required to save the last 5 images.  We offer radiation protective and x-ray eye obscuring bras, bra inserts and more USA made ship worldwide Rocky Flats Gear.

  • full body scanning is a form of RAPE

    and anyone that is ok with this form of RAPE is a weak sheepeople without the sense of honour

  • I will take my next holiday in New Zealand. The kiwis were smart enough to ban the use of body scanners on their airports.

    Fortunately, my home country has also banned body scanners so I can safely travel to New Zealand without having to pass through any scanner-infested airports.

  • @DeeperBlueThought I think the number is 1.5 billion fly each year, perhaps fewer with the new scanners. The cancer estimate is 1:30 million per scan the dose is really 2x front and back. Rate could be 1:15M or perhaps 100 people/year, 300 souls on 9-11 10 years ago 30/y? Breast, eyes, testiculs and the skin are sensitive to x-rays. As cancer does not show up for some time very difficult to pin it on x-rays but, cancer rates will continue to increase. This is madness all for "safety"??

  • Youngbleeb, we could not agree more the public health risk is huge, one more reason cancer rates will continue to rise. We at Rocky Flats Gear make x-ray protective undergarment, offer privacy and protection until this dangerous equipment is removed from service. We have shipped many pairs down under, sorry you chaps are getting scanned. Jeff

  • I`m sorry for the guy who has to keep looking at others guys junk....

  • These machines tamper with and alter human DNA strands. They cost $150,000 each machine, a trained sniffer dog costs $8,000 and is MORE effective, proven FACT.

    NWO CRACKDOWN! THESE MACHINES HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH SECURITY!

  • Who doesn't enjoy radiation sickness?

  • @arcadianwave You KNOW it! ! IF ANYONE BELIEVES its about "SAFETY" they have been sent INSANE!.

    ANY passenger has ALWAYS been free to SMASH a Duty Free VODKA BOTTLE onboard flights!

    ALL 'bombers' PROVED to be connected to Govt. Set up FAKES! 9/11 Govt set up FAKE!

    NOT ONE FAKE 'bomber'' was ever caught by scans BEFORE boarding.

    FIGHT this SLAVE control training!!

    More death happens in swimming pools in 1yr than 10yr on planes

    Cancer from radiation is BIG BUSINESS

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more