4-4-2 vs 4-3-3.avi

Formations of 4-4-2 vs. 4-3-3 were simulated using pro evolution soccer 2010.

Category:

Gaming

Tags:

• soccer

[drucik]

Using game, where off-the-ball movement is virtually non existent, especially when talking about moving into spaces makes this 'simulation' not very accurate and real.

[rafa8414]

como se nota que el que hizo esto es un friki de aupa... que tiene que ver la play con la realidad?? yo soy entrenador y te puedo decir que mas allá del 4-3-3 y el 4-4-2 hoy otros factores tácticos que son mucho mas importantes como en que zona apliques la presión, el ensayo de la transición, si defiendes en zona o no, las coberturas defensivas ect ect... hay tantas cosas que los entrenadores tenemos que trabajar que los que no lo sois no os lo podéis ni imaginar, el dibujo influye poco.

[darkoneforce2]

Big teams use 4-5-1 or 4-2-3-1.

Even the new Barca 4-3-3 is actually a hybrid evolved from Chelsea's 4-5-1.

[Maradobbo]

....especially with fast, adventurous full-backs getting forward and supporting the wingers. Furthermore, the best European club teams often play 451 rather than 433 in big games, i.e. with a denser midfield constraining the space for the opposing team whilst attempting to impose control of possession

[Maradobbo]

Interesting approach, but too contingent on the specific teams, and the nature of the game itself. I wonder if the 'simulation' had been run a large number of times, over more teams... but even then, conclusions are better reached from 'real world' football. To take one example from the video, width is always good (especially when combined with quick passing, making the most of space) but unlike the simulation here suggests, this is not necessarily sacrificed in 442 relative to 433...

[shearewell]

nice compare

[marioflipao1990]

really nice 5/5