RF900 142 MPH
Uploader Comments (mrhudock)
All Comments (25)
-
standerd should do 164mph topped me dads with me on the back has had 170
-
WOW!! Forgot about this post. Now 2 years later , I did go with the RF and I am really happy with it. I had many opportunities to move on to another bike , like the ZZR and the Busa. But I kept my $2200 RF. I ran it to hell and back (daily commuter) . Lost both bottom fairings running it so hard. I forgot I needed to check those mounting screws. I put over 20k in those 2 years. It is heavy, solid and once you bring the revs up, it's good-bye traffic. Dropped it a couple times doing PLP.
-
Killerbike.. will kill the blade from that yeartype at ease. Today's world every 600cc and maybe even a 750 with a bad rider on it wil be bad meat.
-
i've had mine at 173mph
-
any mods??
-
F-the tuna. If you confirm the RF's clean and don't forget to check the inherent 2nd gear slip under load, buy it or I will.
-
I am torn between a 2006 Katana 750 rebuilt ( replaced front forks) with 800 miles for $3500, and a 1995 RF900 clean 19000 miles $2500...any suggestion?
-
R&D from Clearwater Florida has street undercut several gearboxes for my RF's.I've never had to send them back.My 97' has 65k on the clock and she had the 1070cc big bore kit.What can I say.... WOW
thats nothing ,, they do 260 standard
richmondshane 3 years ago
Um, first off, 260 = 161 mph. So only 15 mph faster. And they go even faster then that. I have already pushed mine to 181 on the same trip (291 standard) but its hard to get film from that setup.
mrhudock 3 years ago
that bike will go faster than that mine does
armoral 4 years ago
Oh it absolutely does, the problem was the camera mount, not the bike or me. I took 1/2 decent shot over death with good shot.
mrhudock 4 years ago
Faster!
PaulSlut 4 years ago
My camera mount system isn't the best, took to much focus on camera to really max it out.
mrhudock 4 years ago