Forbidden Fruit, A Clockwork Orange Tony Parsons Part 1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
40,830
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 3, 2010

A With Out Walls Documentary from 1993 About A Clockwork Orange which was Still Withdrawn From Public Viewing In The UK At The Time Of Making, At Stanley Kubrick's Request.

Contributions From Author Bill Buford, Film Critic Alexander Walker, The Then Head Of The British Film Institute Wilf Stevenson, Actors Miriam Karlin And Steven Birkoff

Originally Broadcast 26/10/1993

Part 2 Is Here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omFr1IH7Smc

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • 0:44 its the annoying orange :D

see all

All Comments (21)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Oh yah, thats Burgess with two ss'ssses LOL. The big literary critic that I am. LOL

  • @SCORNDOGGMELACH thanks for the reply.

  • NEVER MIND KUBRICK, READ BURGES. Shit, read something! Few people realize that this is what separates them from men like Kubrick. Start creating instead of sucking on other peoples art. Just for the record- One of my all time favorite movies.

  • Love Kubrick's films but he is granted too much credit for Burges' masterpiece. It was clear the impact this novel had on Kubrick as he shyed from altering the story outside of replacing Alex's love of Motzart with that of "the old Ludwig Van" and the last chapter that suggested the beginnings of a reformation in the youth's character. Those boobs that flocked around this film for the "ultra violence, and a bit of the old in out, MISSED THE POINT.No, NOT ABOUT GOOD AND EVIL AT ALL. LOWBROWS.

  • @1point7g Well if your asking, I would have to say yes, if for no other reason than to see if the origional themes and intentions were preserved in the film. Fortunetly Kubrick remained extremely attentive to Burges' novel (masterpiece) that is up untill the last chapter. In the film, our story ends with Alexs' recovery in the hospital, whearas the noval wraps up with Alex coming to some sort of awakening concerning his future, mariage, children and awareness of literacy.

  • The intro is questionable. The question was presented by Burges as follows. Is it the responsibility of the state to reform the criminal element or is it up to the individual? It also points to the absurdity of a societys role (legal system) in approaching (nay) reacting to that element. Who's good, Whos evil? Evil feeling good is irrelevent to this story's theme. This is a reactionary observation of those who missed the point. Kubrick also irrelevant. Its Burges that is the creative element.

  • @jchao4m milk

  • what are they drinking?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more