INDIANA JONES 4 FIRST REVIEW

For Lots More Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull:

http://www.reelzchannel.com/movie/236889/indiana-jones-and-the-kingdom-of-the...

Todd McCarthy, Chief Film Critic from Variety reviews Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull starring Harrison Ford and Shia LaBeouf.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Indiana
• Jones
• and
• Kingdom
• of
• the
• Crystal
• Skull
• indy
• Harrison
• Ford
• Shia
• LaBeouf
• Reelz
• Channel
• trailer
• teaser
• review

[ABEY73]

what was wrong with indy being n the 50s? those were the best times! like route 66, classic cars, drive in movie theaters, mid century diners and hotels, alien n monster b movies! man i wich i lived n those days! like this old man once sed, the fifties r gone forever! n that is so true. sigh

[cubbyguy1]

Look, anyone who expected the movie to be of the same quality as the originals is insane. But it comes pretty close for a new Indiana Jones movie. There are quite a few small things that were either unnecessary or could have been done better but overall it's a good movie.

[TheShinema]

I lwould ove to live in the 50s...but the problem is that it wasn't great for everyone like *cough blacks and other minorities...

[chuggyman69]

@ABEY73 ya but girls didnt shave their pubic hair so eating pussy and ass would be gross : /

[SergeantLuke]

You ever notice how most of the comments on these videos are people defending the film and talking about how much they loved it?

[TheDavfit]

Excellent .....period

[ElliottWilliamSalt]

@AmericanOutlaw87 To me Indy 4 had great action sequence, Spielberg uses the same system he used in the trilogy. He builds action scenes where the places, objects and people are always changing : the skull goes from heroes to villains and vice versa just like the lost ark, the ground reveals thousands of ants just like the snakes in Raiders. Also I agree Indy 4 was different , Spielberg's way of making films changed to become more mature. That's why Indy 4 is less childish than the others.

[AmericanOutlaw87]

@ElliottWilliamSalt It's funny, kid, that YOU don't have an arguement in defense of this film. The picture is a godawful experience because it's BORING. It had HALF the escapism and violence of the average Indy film. Watch Crusade and then watch this one right after it. You will see a clear difference: Indy 4 was a tired affair. The purpose for watching these movies was gone. I doubt you posses the intelligence or balls to refute my points, but alas...

[AmericanOutlaw87]

@LeanneFilmsInc I wanted to cry after seeing the movie, thank you very much. It wasn't as good as the originals you say? Then don't make the damn film. Aliens? Who cares about the aliens? The film is a godawful experience not because of the aliens, but because it's BORING. It had HALF the escapism and violence of the average Indy film. Watch Crusade and then watch this one right after it. You will see a clear difference: Indy 4 was a tired affair. The purpose for watching Indy was gone.

[AmericanOutlaw87]

@Volts48 No, it was not fun. Who cares about the aliens, the fridge, the 50's, the stupid CGI, and the scene that rips off the Mummy? The main problem with the film was that it was a tired affair. It had half the excitement, half the violence, and half the adventure of the last three films. Not only that, but the villian was godawful. In short, it was a boring, dreadful experience and REAL Indiana Jones fans should shun it.

[Volts48]

I'll say this:

I don't get why everyone hates it. Granted, it's not as good as "Raiders", "Temple of Doom", or "Last Crusade" but I had a blast going in and seeing Harrison Ford be Indiana Jones after all these years.

It's not a perfect movie but I still had fun.