Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Just how good are NASA climate models?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
155 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 29, 2011

Nobel Prize winner Sir Paul Nurse examines NASA climate computer models? Taken from Horizon: Science Under Attack http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/tv using fair useage policy.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (blackadderthe4)

  • Holding Nurse to the same standard you try to hold GW skeptics to "Sir Paul Maxime Nurse is a British geneticist and cell biologist. He was awarded the 2001 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine - nothing to do with climate or even weather, therefore an unqualified simpleton.

    The 'model' is laughable. If it is so friggen' perfect at modeling current weather, why can't they predict a hurricane storm track within 200 kilometers? This is nonsense.

  • @DrDelos

    It is only a sound bite from a much larger documentary and if you had seen it you would hve realise he was talking about the science facts, not myths like deniers do

    watch?v=Grih2wtuLY4

    watch?v=0cw7MS12flU

    ‘why can't they predict a hurricane storm track within 200 kilometers?’ because no doubt the technology is in its infancy! Would you have expected the week after the Wright brothers flew, hundreds would be flown across the Atlantic? When their flight wasn't the wingspan of a 747!

  • @blackadderthe4 I saw the entire series and commented on a few segments. Mr NASA (NOT a climate scientist, BTW) was bragging about how good their models were. They are all CRAP in predicting the future 100 years from now if they can't predict storm tracks one or two days in advance. In other words, the 45 TRILLION dollars that Mann, Hansen, Jones and this crackpot want us to spend to stall GW could just as well all be bet at the roulette table on red.

  • @DrDelos

    'They are all CRAP in predicting the future 100 years' are you for REAL! Well I guess not, because it looks like you would prefer to play Russian roulette with the planet!

Video Responses

This video is a response to Al Gore Debates Global Warming
see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more