Just how good are NASA climate models?
Loading...
155
views
Loading...
Uploader Comments (blackadderthe4)
Video Responses
This video is a response to Al Gore Debates Global Warming
Loading...
Holding Nurse to the same standard you try to hold GW skeptics to "Sir Paul Maxime Nurse is a British geneticist and cell biologist. He was awarded the 2001 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine - nothing to do with climate or even weather, therefore an unqualified simpleton.
The 'model' is laughable. If it is so friggen' perfect at modeling current weather, why can't they predict a hurricane storm track within 200 kilometers? This is nonsense.
DrDelos 8 months ago
@DrDelos
It is only a sound bite from a much larger documentary and if you had seen it you would hve realise he was talking about the science facts, not myths like deniers do
watch?v=Grih2wtuLY4
watch?v=0cw7MS12flU
‘why can't they predict a hurricane storm track within 200 kilometers?’ because no doubt the technology is in its infancy! Would you have expected the week after the Wright brothers flew, hundreds would be flown across the Atlantic? When their flight wasn't the wingspan of a 747!
blackadderthe4 8 months ago
@blackadderthe4 I saw the entire series and commented on a few segments. Mr NASA (NOT a climate scientist, BTW) was bragging about how good their models were. They are all CRAP in predicting the future 100 years from now if they can't predict storm tracks one or two days in advance. In other words, the 45 TRILLION dollars that Mann, Hansen, Jones and this crackpot want us to spend to stall GW could just as well all be bet at the roulette table on red.
DrDelos 8 months ago
@DrDelos
'They are all CRAP in predicting the future 100 years' are you for REAL! Well I guess not, because it looks like you would prefer to play Russian roulette with the planet!
blackadderthe4 8 months ago