ASSUMING an age of 6 million years, bottles them into thinking the sediments are completely solid and would require much more water. On the other hand than, if you more recent deposit of sediments your could easily see that it wouldn't require nearly as much water. But we all know they reject anything that doesn't support an old earth and evo. So let them continue scratching their heads while the rest of us look at it and say "makes sense to me".
@NephilimFree shockingly hypocritical from a man that provides ZERO evidence or sources to provide his psychosis induced ramblings that he calls science
@NephilimFree Cont. nor would I ever state that those people that studied for someting and who are doing the research, are in the lab or in the field and are writing paper and presenting it to anonimous peer review, are wrong where as I with my lack of education know it all better
And I certainly would not redefine any terminology used by those same scientist or purposely misinterpret data, quotemine or lie about the people or matter
if I only had read internet pages the last 3-4 years
@NephilimFree I could have expected this as you are the champion of projection.
"Sedimentary rocks are formed when sediment is deposited out of air, ice, wind, gravity, or water flows carrying the particles in suspension. " See or waterflows not just waterflows real science does start with a conclusion by wich a hypothesis is made and then sift though the evidence others have found and pick only those fact supporting it and denying those that constradict it
@Toudiyama Are you ever going to tell me the science that verifies that the flood did not create this deep sediment across the earth? I have asked you at least 3 times to tell me how such deep sediment could cover the earth if it has not been globally innundated. So tell me how such deep sediment covering the earth could be created without global innundation. Don't be a chickenchit. Tell me the science that demonstrates this happened without global innundation. Are you a coward or what?
"there's no concencus on how it formed, but what we DO KNOW it that it begun flowing 4,5 MYA"
lol you can question everything but it's age!
indoctrinated ppl don't catch that
IloveYOUviruses 9 months ago
ASSUMING an age of 6 million years, bottles them into thinking the sediments are completely solid and would require much more water. On the other hand than, if you more recent deposit of sediments your could easily see that it wouldn't require nearly as much water. But we all know they reject anything that doesn't support an old earth and evo. So let them continue scratching their heads while the rest of us look at it and say "makes sense to me".
neoverse 1 year ago
@NephilimFree shockingly hypocritical from a man that provides ZERO evidence or sources to provide his psychosis induced ramblings that he calls science
lefayad1991 1 year ago
@NephilimFree Cont. nor would I ever state that those people that studied for someting and who are doing the research, are in the lab or in the field and are writing paper and presenting it to anonimous peer review, are wrong where as I with my lack of education know it all better
And I certainly would not redefine any terminology used by those same scientist or purposely misinterpret data, quotemine or lie about the people or matter
if I only had read internet pages the last 3-4 years
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@NephilimFree I could have expected this as you are the champion of projection.
"Sedimentary rocks are formed when sediment is deposited out of air, ice, wind, gravity, or water flows carrying the particles in suspension. " See or waterflows not just waterflows real science does start with a conclusion by wich a hypothesis is made and then sift though the evidence others have found and pick only those fact supporting it and denying those that constradict it
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama I accept your failure because you were unwilling and/or unable to supprt yuor absurd claim made in the name of evolutionism. CYA
NephilimFree 1 year ago
@NephilimFree one of the URLs you posted stated that there are places with no sedimentairy rock at
If there are many distinct strata(which there are) then each stratum had time to settle, time your flood can't give them
Toudiyama 1 year ago
@Toudiyama Are you ever going to tell me the science that verifies that the flood did not create this deep sediment across the earth? I have asked you at least 3 times to tell me how such deep sediment could cover the earth if it has not been globally innundated. So tell me how such deep sediment covering the earth could be created without global innundation. Don't be a chickenchit. Tell me the science that demonstrates this happened without global innundation. Are you a coward or what?
NephilimFree 1 year ago