The Evolution of the Flagellum

yea dude, the existence of an all powerful god no one has seen is WAY more likely

...i quote: when scientist do research....they have always found "evidence" .....through multiple functional intermediates.....

Do you yourself know what your are saying?

Excuse me that I (as a bible believer) are not hypnotised with those very complex senteces (the "scientific cool babble talk" )

I also must almost commend you on your unrelenting faith in something happening completely at random (myriads of things that would have to happen in just the right order actually) that dwarfs the complexity of what the best human minds have ever concieved.

Truly not to be disrespectful, but this nothing more than science fiction. The mathematical probability against this process happening as described on here has to be just outrageous. This is not to mention all of the other things that have to come together just right as well. Yes, the complexity issue is "done to death" becaues it is true, sort of like 2+2=4; yes it gets "boring" but it is still true. And no, you have not refuted anything this so-called evidence.

Just because it is too complex for you to understand how evolution works does not disprove it. I would suggest you educate yourself and learn what we have learned. That these things work together.

You do not understand evolution and you do not understand how the flagellum works too. You did not watch the video either.

So you say, but I expect you are thinking that the flagellum was a goal. It's called the Texas sharpshooter fallacy. Additions that various generations stumbled onto gave rise (through branching descent and fairly frequent gene mixing) to subsequently more and more complex compilations.

No, I don't think of it as a goal. You can think of it as the opposite of a goal if you like. Yes, microevolution is possible. But there's no reason for a flagellum to magic itself into existence the way it did and have the same purpose. And we agree that yes, it all happens through "complexity." I'm fine with agreeing that you can add ridiculous things onto another thing and eventually get somewhere. The problem is, the odds aren't in your favor. Complexity does not = simplicity.