Road Warrior Commentary on Atheism 1: The KingHeathen Slapdown on True Christianity vs. Lookalikes

The Christian Road Warrior begins the slapdown on atheist "KingHeathen" who tried in vain to respond to the warrior's first "rant" against so-called ex-Christians who became atheists.

As you will see, this atheist, who claims to have been a true Christian in the past, has no real conception of what Biblical Christianity is. Like most atheists the warrior has encountered on YouTube, he's so Biblically illiterate that it is no wonder he became an atheist.

True, regenerative faith does not and will not lead to atheism. Anyone who argues differently simply does not have a firm grasp of Biblical theology.

The warrior doesn't have to have "been there" to know the truth of what Scripture teaches as revealed by God, who DOES know the hearts and WAS there.

And He has made it clear through passages like Matthew 7:21-23 and 1 John 2:19, as well as others, that there is such a thing as false believers who LOOK like true ones, and that those who leave us and become "anti-Christ" (or against Christ) do so because they NEVER really were of us. That stands regardless of the rhetoric that has no basis in Scripture or reality.

Also, as promised in the video, here's a link to the New Testament commentary: http://www.soniclight.com/constable/notes.htm

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Atheism
• Debunking
• ex-Christian
• myth
• deconvert
• christianity
• religion
• king
• heathen
• azsuperman
• freethinking

[CRoadwarrior]

@vesperus1981 If he could have posted his "list" "off the top of his head" he would have already. He likes to posture but his knowledge of Christian theology is of the most superficial nature.

[CRoadwarrior]

@KingHeathen Now the real joke is that you don't get the fact that I'm not a "wrestler wannabe" but an imitator with a purpose. But what is no joke is that a) I know what it really means from the Bible to be truly Christian, and b) I am a true Christian, and c) The Bible is clear that true Christans REMAIN what they were born into. The "joke" is that apparently you never got that.

[CRoadwarrior]

@KingHeathen Actually, there is but one Biblically sound Christian theology. There has been heresy since Eve added to God's word in the garden. But that doesn't prove that one central truth doesn't exist. There is no true "circular nature" in relying on Scripture, since the Bible was not produce by one human author.  And that "IF" is not even valid, since the Bible is not false. There are true Christians, theo ones who have been born again of God's Spirit.

[vesperus1981]

@KingHeathen where is he list? Send it to me.

[MrPaulroxx]

LOL. Any idea where I can get those good books? When are you going to put up the next part? And being born again is TOTALLY NOT symbolic we are SPIRITUALLY born again NOT like athiests who think it is "symbolic" or "physical."

[KingHeathen]

@CRoadwarrior What's interesting about your assertion here is that you appear to assume that there is only ONE Christian theology. You do realize that even CHRISTIANS can't agree on what the Christian theology is, right? Besides, your theology is meaningless here. The circular nature of relying on scripture to support you fails if the Bible is false. In that case, by your logic, NO ONE is a Christian. And the only joke here is you playing wrestler-wannabe.

[CRoadwarrior]

@KingHeathen What you've proven repeatedly is that you don't have an accurate grasp of Christian theology, you don't know and never did know the Bible in any depth, and your understanding of basic logic is a joke.

[CRoadwarrior]

@KingHeathen I don't need a "crystal ball" because I have common sense based on what I do know. Just like I know you don't know Hebrew or Greek. How do I know? Because of how you argue in your videos and the kind of arguments against the Bible that you make. No "crystal ball" needed.

[CRoadwarrior]

@KingHeathen No, I did not attack you personally. You claim it. You were refuted soundly and don't even know it. LOL.

[KingHeathen]

@CRoadwarrior ad hominem...you attack the character of the person instead of their arguments. You did that REPEATEDLY. Go sharpen your spikes and practice your bad impersonations more. The "meat" of your argument is rancid!