Why Charlie Veitch Changed his Mind on 911 - 1/3

Max Igan talks with Charlie Veitch

Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNmJ3ujFth8

A candid conversation between max igan and charlie veitch regarding his recent change of heart on the 911 conspiracy.

For the record, I dont wish to demonize charlie but I still think it was an inside job.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• max igan
• charlie veitch
• 911 truth

[CharlieVeitch911LIAR]

@TheBaafarang "If he really was paid off...why piss n moan about it? Its done..hes sold out..move on." uhh because he's spewing lies and misleading countless clueless people and needs to be exposed like all liars and cheats.

[pipem4n]

It's amazing how penetrated is internet and everyone can be an schill. This guy is clearly one. First make some fiendly and "loving" gestures than mix it with some gov. BS that was going to be sent into ether in the first place. Suddenly the guy knows how the amazing forces between concrete plates poverised those concrete ojects. Not a possible explenation it is at all. Wonder if the guy thinks sometimes about physics. Like when and why flowing water freezes... Complete fucking agent slut moron!

[kingg213]

@jackan92 Another total moron!

[aodscarecrow]

@jackan92 No the difference is that I trust facts and evidence and conduct my own research in order to back them up, whereas you trust propaganda and choose to believe what you are told. You obviously do not believe "facts" as the facts and evidence clearly and very amply indicate that the official narrative is based on pseudo science and holds no water under any unbiased scrutiny.

[jackan92]

@aodscarecrow The difference between us is simply that we believe in different things, and you know as good as I that it is really hard to change someone through the internet. We all make our own decisions about theories and you happen to believe in facts that I don't. Vice versa.

[aodscarecrow]

@jackan92 I think you are missing the point entirely, most especially with your use of the term "conspiratorial" simply because the official narrative is itself a conspiracy theory. It is a conspiracy because it involves more than one person and it is a theory as no proof of the claim has ever been presented. People just believe it to be true due to the mainstream media repeating it so much. However evidence is evidence and a lie does not become truth through constant repetition.

[jackan92]

@kingg213 Que? Building seven? The building that burned uncontrollably for several hours and the one you say couldn't burn down from only fire? Of course a building can't burn for that long without taking some damage you sausage. Steel doesn't hold as well when heated up that much and therefor it is able to collapse.

[kingg213]

@jackan92 BUILDING SEVEN MORON!

[jackan92]

@kingg213 You idiot, because it is only 1300 architects that says it was an inside job, then the rest obviously thinks otherwise (that it wasn't an inside job) or they would be in that 1300 group.

[wwwigz]

@TheBaafarang Hallilujah! - I see many of his rationalisations too. I really wish I had the chance to go where he did, see the things he did and speak to the people he did. He's a lucky man in that respect, but did he really have to throw it all back in our faces?