Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The WTC towers did not "collapse into their footprints"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
5,429
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 22, 2006

The WTC towers did not "collapse into their footprints" Griffin is plain wrong.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 25 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (representativepress)

  • Haha yeah you did your research and this definitively disproves claims made by an abbundance of in depth hour or more long documentarys about 911... none of which (that i've seen) made any such claims that the north and south towers fell into their footprints.

  • Dr. Griffin listed ten characteristics of the collapses which all indicate that the buildings did not fall due to being struck by planes or the ensuing fires. He explained the buildings fell suddenly without any indication of collapse. They fell straight into their own footprint at free-fall speed,

  • Who said that the 2 towers collapsed into their own footprints? no links to blogs or message boards please. And, could you do the same for building 7?

  • http://www.globalresearch.ca/i­ndex.php?context=viewArticle&c­ode=20051021&articleId=1129

    http://deseretnews.com/dn/view­/0,1249,635160132,00.html

    

  • Thanks buddy, you did your research and I congradulate you. Those conspiracy theory douche bags are an insult to america.

  • you are welcome.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (60)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • INSIDE JOB

  • all this talk of demolition is making me hungry.. oops no wait its 1pm lunch time.

  • Giggathebetteh,

    No steel was thrown upwards. I dare you to show me that. I already know the pictures you're refering to and its laughable to think that you imagine its steel beams. Watch a video and watch what happens to those pieces you are no doubt looking at. They waft around, because they are the aluminum cladding.

    I "LMAO" at people who think that steel could be "ejected" yet not make any explosion sounds. Why wont you guys watch any real demolitions with the sound turned on?

  • justprivate, ahh yes Painfull Deceptions, the one made by the raving anti-semite.

  • What did you expect to happen? Theres demolitions where the buildings literally fall over so even if it did something like that you guys would still say it looked like a demoliiton.

  • Are you suggesting that pictures of massive damage to surrounding buildings in a wide radius are not pictures of massive damage to surrounding buildings in a wide radius?

  • There were no demolition sounds. How can cameras pick up a plane hitting the tower but not these giant demolition sounds? Go watch a real demolition. You cant accidently miss them. And what do you mean ask the firemen? They dont agree with you either. Try and find one that thinks it was strange WTC7 collapsed. Good luck with that.

  • levels of damage. I cant remember if its from the FEMA report or NIST.

  • What "many explosions on live TV"? I never have once seen ONE video where you can hear the loud and characteristic cascade of sharp blasts you hear during EVERY large explosive building demolition, EVER. Tell me where I can find this video.

  • Sorry, it is labled, it's just difficult to read.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more