Jeep historic Wagoneer commercial
Top Comments
All Comments (37)
-
What a degrading jeep this was
-
@counkev yA,but for some buttfucked reason, milage in vehicles has gone up since then
-
HA Fucken Liars! 34 EST HWY at :09 not even close. SUV's now a days don't even get that. Especially not the American Vehicles.
-
12 Yards long, 2 lanes wide, 65 tons of American Pride!
-
AMC's gotta love 'em.
-
@Amund7 Thanks man. I appreaciate that. I have never seen one in my time and I've been a Jeep guy for a while, but I heard of Renault engines. I do think you are correct though. Again, thanks alot, I appreciate it.
-
@DieselFreak94 PS. I think they were sold a lot in Canada with diesels.
-
@DieselFreak94 I am pretty sure all of them were built US or Canada, even tho the engines were first Renault (2.1, France) and later VM Mottorii (2.5, Italy) - seems they shipped the engines to America first and then shipped the cars back overseas later? Sounds very stupid, but that's what all the info I can find say, including the plant location in the VIN numbers.
-
@Amund7 Did they ever make those deisels in the U.S.? Some say yes and others say no. I have never seen one.
-
@ryleyf You should be glad you didn't get the Cherokee diesels. They thoroughly suck. And I have first hand experience, I rebuilt a 2.1 TD cherokee engine
What I find disgusting is Ford will sell Rangers in Japan with Turbo Diesels, but they don't meet "Emission" standards here in the US.. 2 words... Bull... and Shit.
Magnuspire 3 years ago 6
The early Cherokee/Wagoneer was available with a turbodiesel and a 5 speed manual, I've only ever seen one and I'm pretty much a Cherokee whore, but they do exist and they did get damn good gas mileage, well up into the 30's on the highway. It's a shame that US automakers aren't putting more small diesels in cars, they're so much more efficient than gasoline engines.
ryleyf 3 years ago 3