Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Potential Difference Inc Bi-Toroid Transformer Demo Part 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
4,409
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 22, 2008

PRO-PEACE, OIL FREE, NEW FREE-WORLD ORDER TECHNOLOGY
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1656880303867390173&hl=en
Http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/

Part 2 of Bi_toroid transformer series showing over unity transformer with proper power factor reading.

More discussion here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4047.3000/topicseen.html

And see additional data here:
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=17RP9ZYV

IN A CONVENTIONAL TRANSFORMER THE POWER FACTOR WOULD BE 1 (FOR A PURELY RESISTIVE LOAD AS USED HERE) - MEANING THE CURRENT AND VOLTAGE ARE IN PHASE WITH EACH OTHER.

THIS TRANSFORMER IS NOT IN PHASE BECAUSE THE BRIDGE DIVERTS SOME OF THE SECONDARY BACK EMF INDUCED FLUX. THIS DIVERTED FLUX ENTERS THE OPPOSING SECONDARY IN THE SAME DIRECTION AS THE PRIMARY FLUX AND HELPS MAINTAIN THE VOLTAGE ACCROSS THE LOAD. SO NOW WE HAVE A SITUATION WHERE DIVERTED BACK EMF FLUX IS DOING "WORK" THAT WOULD OTHERWISE HAVE HAD TO BE SUPPLIED BUT THE SOURCE.

THIS DIVERTED FLUX WOULD OTHERWISE CAUSE THE PRIMARY IMPEDANCE TO DROP AND CAUSE IT TO DRAW MORE CURRENT FROM THE SOURCE.NOW IT DOESN'T HAVE TO AND THE SAVINGS CAN NOW BE APPLIED TO THE LOAD.

WITH A MORE EFFICIENT BRIDGE, SLIGHTLY LARGER WIRE, AND ADDITIONAL BI-TOROID "SPLITTING" THIS TRANSFORMER WILL CONTINUE TO IMPROVE.

CHEERS
Thane

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (ThaneCHeins)

  • I assume that you checked the resistor to make sure that it was exactly 100 ohms.

  • The resistance is 100.5 ohms.

    Thanks

    Thane

see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • IT'S WRONG ANALISE IN VIDEO. 1/ WHEN USE BOTH SECONDARY COIL THEY CANCAL EACH OTHER SO THE ONLY WAY THAT FLUX GO IS IN PRIMER COLI LIKE A STANDART TTRANSFORMER. NO ENERGY WIN  2/ WHEN USE ONE SECONDARY COIL ON LOAD THERE IS NO CANCAL FLUX BUT PRIMERY COIL FLUX HAS E EASY TO GO THE SECONDAR COIL UNLOAD SO THE VOLTAGE ON SENDARY DROP MUCH. AND SO DON'T HAVE WIN ENERGY. REPLY ME12:56 12/09/2010

  • Hi all

    I'm not big on physics but I do have a natural aptitude for electricity. However I did not study electrical engineering so I have no Idea if my theory is viable. I designed a compact system that consists of readily available electrical components and should (in theory) have the same functionality and applications as the internal combustion engine.

    Is there a future for such a system or has this technology been outdone by research like that done here?

  • Note that power in is the current in the primary times the voltage across the primary. The power out is the current through the secondary times the voltage across the secondary.

    You need IrmsIN, VrmsIN, IrmsOUT, VrmsOUT, the phase lag in (phaseIN), and the phase lag out (phaseOUT) to calculate the power values.

  • The measured numbers on the meters, are those amplitudes or DC?

    And, the scope shows AC, where is that measured and what is the frequency?

    Or am I missing something? :)

    thanks

  • Well, that's certainly satisfactory. This whole overunity concept is worth pursuing. I have a magazine article from 1976, showing research into this concept.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more