Atheist hides from question; Would you shut down NAMBLA
Uploader Comments (warezvz)
All Comments (77)
-
@warezvz- No words are not punishable at all. You base actions on the consequences and outcomes of said action, not merely the threat or concept of an action. I despise NAMBLA and I personally feel they're all mentally ill. But at the same time I would be going against my core beliefs of freedom of speech and expression if I didn't let them have their say. What you seem to not understand is, EVERYONE else also has their say, meaning that they'll be outnumbered.
-
I guess the missing link is the specific ancestor where homo-sapiens (and the 14+ other homo-whatevers) diverged from modern apes? Fossils so rarely form it might very well not exist. If it does, if there's no genetic material, we might never know what it is for sure. Hell we might already have it and not know.
The evidence is so complete though that it's like one unimportant frame from a three hour movie being blurry... it's... trivial... and there's no competing movie.
-
@Ryakki Well if you didnt know the big mystery is that they havent found the missing link between man and monkey, the one that would prove evolution. And i agree, not knowing doesnt mean god and also dont mean evolution
-
They've found so many fossils at so many stages now... I'm really not entirely sure what "missing link" there is to be found. I mean, the fact that we have any fossils are all is amazing, it's only under extremely unusual circumstances that they ever form in the first place. The completeness of the fossil record is what amazes me, lol. I guess I'm the opposite on that one.
As for the energy for the big bang, we're not there yet, but not knowing exactly doesn't mean god.
-
@Ryakki No you take it the wrong way, i would gladly welcome Evolution IF it could be proven. They have found hundreds if not thousands of dinosaur skeleton wich in the theory of Evolution is way longer back then the "missing link" BUT they havent even found ONE missing link. Also the whole idea seem dumb to me, 2 rocks created the big bang that created everything..well what created the rocks?And most important, the guy who came up with evolution stoped believeing in it cuz it had to many holes.
-
Meh, we can watch viruses and bacteria evolve, and the evidence for evolution being correct in whole is as massive a body as that for gravity or atomic theory. The lack of an eye witness for the entirety of the evolution of life on earth seems like you're just LOOKING for something to grasp on to in order to disbelieve.
If there was 1/100th the evidence in a murder trial as there is for evolution, it'd be an absolute slam dunk.
-
@Ryakki that still dont prove anything, scientists can cultivate human organs on rats, that doesnt mean we came from rats. Many animals have very similar dna , and so do humans, it still doesnt proove anything. I can prove to you 100% that when you connect electricity to a lamp it illuminate, but you can not prove to me 100% that Evolution is true. You see my point?
I am a software developr and sometime you think that a code will work 100% in theory but when test it you find out it didnt work
-
Ok uh... how about we and chimps sharing 99% of our dna exactly including vestigial dna that, as far as we can tell, doesn't even do anything. And how we have one fewer chromosome, and one of our chromosomes has end pieces in the middle as if it fused at some point. How about the dozen or so valid species of non-homo sapiens, other species of humans, that have been found? What about being able to watch the development of life from simple to complex in the fossil record?
-
@Ryakki That is not true, and iam not a hardcore creationist. just give me REAL evidence and i will believe in your science 100%. because science is facts, and the problem with Darwinc theory is that its only a theory, that even he stoped believing in before he died.
-
These days there's not much missing. That's somewhat of an old concept that creationists hang onto as an excuse not to believe more than anything that's actually an issue for science.
It's a really simple thing.
One can defent the RIGHT of someone to SAY what the want, without defending or agring with what they say.
As offencive as NAMBLA is, and there are a lot of offencive people out there, if they don't have the right to say what they want, neither do you.
Words are not actions. Actions are punishable by law. Words are not.
Andrewcranky 1 year ago
@Andrewcranky thats where you are wrong
words are punishable. For example if you say "we should overthrow the goverment" its a crime and you go to jail. It has nothing to do with what nambla says its what they want to do. And raping 5 year olds is just wrong and should be punished
warezvz 1 year ago