David Attenborough, Inaccuracies in Darwin and the Tree of Life (Evolution Principle-MJM)

http://stores.lulu.com/mutadis
http://www.lulu.com/content/paperback/the-3-laws-of-life---how-to-become-a-pe...
There is still a small but vital item not fully explained in the Darwin Evolution Principle.
However an explanation is given in the report 'the 3 Laws of Life', availabe on above link.
Video: extract out David Attenborough, Darwin and the Tree of Life as documentation about actual scientific understanding.

Explanation to this video clip:
E=m x c²
The formula of Einstein, brilliant above all by its simplicity. This little formula presents the fundamental law of the entire universe.
The most complex systems, are but composed of building blocks obeying mainly simple fundamental laws.
Evolution:
2 factors are acting simultaneously:
Factor 1: the environment
This is the brilliant discovery of Darwin: the principle of survival of the most adapted or fittest, and other well known popular descriptions.
Factor 2: the genes
Evolution is only possible if genes change from generation to generation.
And there is a very simple reason why genes would change, which I explain in my book.
Note: although genes change each generation due to the mix of male and female genes, there exist also sexless species. With some imagination in chemistry you could even pretend life started with a male and female molecule. All suitable to declare origin of life, but still missing a simple key for a full explanation of evolution. Because simple things have always a longer life than very complicated ones.

Why I dare to mention inaccuracies in King Attenboroughs excellent documentary?
Because he is required to do statements as for example: adaptions as long as they are an improvement for the specie etc.
Adaptions, improvements and more like that are men invented concepts. Nature only obeys the basic laws of physics and dont care for improvements, or any other abstract or emotional invention of the human mind.
Above all , because he did not mention the law I explained in my book! (joke)
M.Mutadis

Addendum
Species that have males and females, mix different genes. They bring changes in new generations. As a result, more copies can survive and become able to breed, while environment is changing. Because the palette of properties is wider. (remember MR Gauss)
Environment is a comprehensive concept and meaning everything, climate, predators, viruses, (even religion) and anything you can imagine that has an influence!

Do unisex species not evolve?

Yes they did, if not they would never exist. Think about viruses, changing very rapidly.
Is it possible that species emerged from different initial basic living material, nearly in a same time era? I dont know, it sounds very logical, but its the matter of scientist gene analysers to find out.
Finally: we forgot the most common law of physics, also acting on all these processes. Until today I did not hear any of the brilliant scientists reveal the whole picture, so I stored the answers in this above mentioned little book. Hence, the first that spends around 5 dollars for it, will uncover the secrets of our mind (note, it's not about money, it's about claiming ideas)

I wrote an Addendum No 2, but due to too long for YouTube rules, I will put it on the video info window 'The Power of Love Nb1' on this channel.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• richard
• david
• attenborough
• charles
• darwin
• evolution
• species
• genes
• dna
• natural
• selection
• environment
• marc
• mutadis
• 進化論
• 演化理論
• 演化理论
• Теория
• эволюции
• Теорія
• еволюції
• teoria
• ewolucji
• la
• teoría
• de
• evolución
• วิวัฒนาการทฤษฎี
• Vývoj
• teorie
• phát
• triển
• lý
• thuyết
• evrim
• teorisi
• θεωρία
• εξέλιξης
• نظرية
• التطور
• התפתחות
• התיאוריה
• विकास
• सिद्धांत
• 진화론

[mutadis1]

Creationists make 2 important errors in their story:

1* The myth of the perfect DNA (genes) replication.

2* An ignorance of the analogy between dead and living material.

1*: ‘Ultra complex living cells containing a system for perfect DNA (genes) transmission?’

Reality is, that but a smaller number of billions of DNA, seeds, eggs, living cells, foetuses, etc result in a ‘normal’ (= NOT perfect, but conditional average) living organism. This is daily scientifically proven.

[mutadis1]

2*: Are water and stones dead material?

Electrons move at high speed inside the atoms of any material. Electrons can move between different atoms (environmental conditions), attracting each other and forming molecules (basic chemistry). If incidentally the food of various atoms is near, temperature, pressure, etc is well, molecules produce autonomously. From atoms (elements) to molecules (materials), the building blocks of each basic virus as well of the complex human body. Any change of…

[mutadis1]

… any change of environment (micro or macro) will influence and may result in changes of either dead of living material. It is only a matter of time for science to puzzle out a full accurate picture of life and evolution techniques. The nearly unbeatable question remains: what is matter and energy, created by the Big Bang? MM

[mutadis1]

Darwin: ‘Evolution by natural selection’; 100% correct. Concluding that species adapt to environment is inaccurate and irrelevant (it is the environment that adapt the species).

The M.Mutadis’ theory completed the evolution principle by: ‘The simple mutations of genetic molecules in the natural reproduction process’.

Reminder: the channel controller removes contemptuous comments. (MJM)

[mutadis1]

We know there are less limitations or taboos in Australia about genetic experiments. So the knowledge there must be comprehensive. If you are convinced to have understood the complete evolution principle we promoted here, you are free to send us a link to any document that demonstrates this new idea if of an earlier date than our publications. Also we will not involve in arguing about minor translation errors or word games in the English language. (Response to comments)

MJM

[TheJamesnao]

I Understand why people want to hold on to social traditions that are instilled in them since child-birth, religion gives us answers and morals to live by and someone to talk to when we are alone and scared and have nothing else. But one can't turn from reason and obvious scientific evidence! There is much proof showing the result of evolution and people who refute the evidence are scared of losing the level of comfort they had in religion and the assurance of salvation. But a new dawn awaits us

[darkfur35]

Evolution is a big farce.....I mean fart.

[animaljp3]

@darkfur35 prove it is a joke

[MrPlokijuhujiko]

I will admit that it's pretty ballsy to proceed each of your arguments with someone who utterly debunks them. Ballsy and stupid.

[SeedsOfHatred]

@darkfur35 Bad, dirty, tasteless, unfair, sure. But at least it has a witty punchline.

The Creationist joke simply finishes with "God did it" and walks away, leaving us with a lot of unanswered questions.

[darkfur35]

evolution is just a bad joke.

[grumpyguts1967]

@ciarogciarogeile thanks , appreciate it.

[ciarogciarogeile]

@grumpyguts1967 Couldn't have said it better meself! Fair play! :)

[ciarogciarogeile]

@txtamaman Indeed, it is funny what people will believe. I don't have a problem with people believing in a God. I would never say that evolution rules out the possibility of the existence of a creator being of some description. Because it doesn't. But to deny evolution is ridiculous. To support either Creationism or evolution requires evidence of one or the other. Evolution has over 3 billion years of evidence (being a product of it, we ourselves are exhibit A...), while Creationism does not.

[ciarogciarogeile]

@txtamaman Everything that you have just said there is a complete lie. I find it very strange that an entire century of true scientific inquiry could be completely wrong, even when hundreds of thousands of scientists working independently of one another in innumerably different fields have all come to the same conclusions about the nature of life on Earth and the physical laws of the universe. Just because you are uncomfortable with them does not negate them.