http://wazooloo.com http://ianjuby.org In this rant, Ian addresses the bogus claim that no intelligent people believe in creation, while intelligent people believe in atheism. Ian also addresses the intellectual bankruptcy of atheistic thought.
@SuperPoliceState You're confusing natural with random. If natural automatically meant random there would be no such thing as science and no, selection is not random.
@MrFlyestNerd (and whatever happens to survive is what it happened to select, which is a tautology). Bettawrekonize Shi Huang said Bettawrekonize, well said. Natural selection is as random as anything that is random. When something is not random, it could only mean intention, plan, or something similar. Selection by human breeders is not random.
@MrFlyestNerd here are some quotes from random blogs: Natural selection is a product of selective pressures. Those selective pressures are random in that they do not try to produce anything specific (ie: original appendages, limbs, organs, organ systems, body plans,etc or the DNA that codes for them). Hence, natural selection is random. It doesn’t try to produce anything with an end goal in mind, it simply selects out whatever happens not to survive
@oldblubblub Atheism is not the same as Agnosticism or non religious. It is categorically incorrect to group them together. One doesn't believe there is a god. The other doesn't know if god exist or not. And the later doesn't subscribe to a religion, what their stance is on the god issue is unknown based on that question. They maybe less religious but to jump to the conclusion that they don't believe in god is false. Unless they say they are Atheist their belief is unknown
@PirateXzibit Also atheism is not "believing" in the "theory" of evolution. I believe in the "facts" of evolution but I'm skeptical about a lot of the "theories" of evolution. So you see, atheism and theory of evolution are two completely different things. Atheism is simply lack of belief in God(s). You clearly know nothing about being an "atheist" which further proves that Creationist aren't very logical.
@PirateXzibit That is not true at all. I'm an atheist and atheism certainly doesn't motivates an inidividual's behavior to the point he can act like an animal. You want to take about people acting like animals, God allowing the slaughter of infants, children, and women. God condoning child abuse (Proverbs 13:24, 23:13-14), God allowing slavery. It teaches that women are inferior to me (Corinthians 14:33-35). I don't know about you but as an Atheist, I find the Bible caused more harm than good.
Freak!
NemesisDK79 3 weeks ago
@SuperPoliceState You're confusing natural with random. If natural automatically meant random there would be no such thing as science and no, selection is not random.
TheScienceFoundation 4 weeks ago
@MrFlyestNerd (and whatever happens to survive is what it happened to select, which is a tautology). Bettawrekonize Shi Huang said Bettawrekonize, well said. Natural selection is as random as anything that is random. When something is not random, it could only mean intention, plan, or something similar. Selection by human breeders is not random.
SuperPoliceState 1 month ago
@MrFlyestNerd here are some quotes from random blogs: Natural selection is a product of selective pressures. Those selective pressures are random in that they do not try to produce anything specific (ie: original appendages, limbs, organs, organ systems, body plans,etc or the DNA that codes for them). Hence, natural selection is random. It doesn’t try to produce anything with an end goal in mind, it simply selects out whatever happens not to survive
SuperPoliceState 1 month ago
@oldblubblub Atheism is not the same as Agnosticism or non religious. It is categorically incorrect to group them together. One doesn't believe there is a god. The other doesn't know if god exist or not. And the later doesn't subscribe to a religion, what their stance is on the god issue is unknown based on that question. They maybe less religious but to jump to the conclusion that they don't believe in god is false. Unless they say they are Atheist their belief is unknown
SuperPoliceState 1 month ago
Revolutionary!
Prophecy 101: Islam and Satan - Walid Shoebat
OurChristJesus 4 months ago
@joshlazarus That's a logical assumption ;)
PirateXzibit 4 months ago
@PirateXzibit Also atheism is not "believing" in the "theory" of evolution. I believe in the "facts" of evolution but I'm skeptical about a lot of the "theories" of evolution. So you see, atheism and theory of evolution are two completely different things. Atheism is simply lack of belief in God(s). You clearly know nothing about being an "atheist" which further proves that Creationist aren't very logical.
joshlazarus 4 months ago
@PirateXzibit That is not true at all. I'm an atheist and atheism certainly doesn't motivates an inidividual's behavior to the point he can act like an animal. You want to take about people acting like animals, God allowing the slaughter of infants, children, and women. God condoning child abuse (Proverbs 13:24, 23:13-14), God allowing slavery. It teaches that women are inferior to me (Corinthians 14:33-35). I don't know about you but as an Atheist, I find the Bible caused more harm than good.
joshlazarus 4 months ago
@odinata damn straight!
Ital21 4 months ago