Top Ten Creationist Arguments

We hear the same Creationist arguments SO OFTEN, we decided to assemble our 10 favorites and address them here. Feel free to use this video as a response to the Creationists in your circle.

• Category

  Nonprofits & Activism

[westbororapist]

I would rather beat myself in the head with a hammer than listen to your bullshit doctrines.

[arthurjeremypearson]

My statement you replied to was a flippant mock of molly's fallacious assertion. Is your theism telling you to accept creationism or evolution?

[reghin79]

That's a good top 10. I've heard most of these arguments myself from the moths of creationists, over and over.

But the most valid line of reasoning is: fine, creationists reject the many notions stemming from evolution theory, which research journals seem to support, because, they say, there is insufficient evidence to sustain them. Why, then, would they believe in a narrative that is only documented by a single black book written by a group of insurgent Jews?

[Allie Ron]

Complete nonsense.

Moses never existed, there was no Exodus, the parting of the waters never happened, and the Great Flood was a myth based on the probable flooding of the Black Sea, a LOCAL flood.

Tyre never fell to Nebuchadnezzar, and the vast amount of errors in the Bible could fill a book of equal thickness.

Time to open your eyes.

[Allie Ron]

Well, you're a moron, then.

Just go to the CERN website and READ THE SCIENCE.

Evolution is merely the explanation of the diversity of life.

Abiogenesis, a hypothesis which will soon become a theory, is NOT evolution.

The "Big Bang" or "Big Bounce" is also a solid theory, supported by massive amounts of evidence.

Seriously, why are you so ignorant in an age when this is theoretically impossible ?

[bacdac11]

Abiogenesis is not a theory.

[Eaglesharpshot]

Evolution: The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water causing several molecules to combine in a random way which by chance resulted in a living cell. The cell then divided and evolved into higher life forms. This view is now proven to be immature to the degree of being ridiculous. The most modern laboratory is unable to create a living cell. In fact, scientists have been unable to create a single left-hand protein molecule as found in all animals.

[Eaglesharpshot]

Also isn't it funny how the Large Hadron Collider has failed to replicate the big bang in its 15 years of existence.... Hmmm... All your so called, "valid evidence" cant seem to begin to prove or replicate what began human life and earth itself!

[Eaglesharpshot]

The Bible has proven to be more historically and archaeologically accurate than any other ancient book. It has been subjected to the minutest scientific textual analysis possible to humanity and has been proven to be authentic in every way. Historical evidence routinely includes ancient literature, business records, and government documents, analyzed in conjunction with linguistics, geography, and archaeological analysis of physical objects, using forensic science techniques.

[mike davis]

By the way, I hope you're not married, Christbots:

'They which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage. -- Luke 20:35

Jesus told his disciples to leave their wives and families. He also said that married men will not go to Heaven, and women cannot get into Heaven AT ALL.