Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in

Top Ten Creationist Arguments

TheThinkingAtheist TheThinkingAtheist·211 videos
127,201
1,234,840
Like     Dislike 2,568

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like TheThinkingAtheist's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike TheThinkingAtheist's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add TheThinkingAtheist's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Dec 30, 2009

We hear the same Creationist arguments SO OFTEN, we decided to assemble our 10 favorites and address them here. Feel free to use this video as a response to the Creationists in your circle.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Video Responses

This video is a response to Richard Dawkins PWNZ Kent Hovind

All Comments (78,308)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • westbororapist

    I would rather beat myself in the head with a hammer than listen to your bullshit doctrines.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate westbororapist's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate westbororapist's comment.
    in reply to mollymu1 (Show the comment)
  • arthurjeremypearson

    My statement you replied to was a flippant mock of molly's fallacious assertion. Is your theism telling you to accept creationism or evolution?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate arthurjeremypearson's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate arthurjeremypearson's comment.
    in reply to shamanahaboolist (Show the comment)
  • reghin79

    That's a good top 10. I've heard most of these arguments myself from the moths of creationists, over and over.

    But the most valid line of reasoning is: fine, creationists reject the many notions stemming from evolution theory, which research journals seem to support, because, they say, there is insufficient evidence to sustain them. Why, then, would they believe in a narrative that is only documented by a single black book written by a group of insurgent Jews?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate reghin79's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate reghin79's comment.
  • Allie Ron

    Complete nonsense.

    Moses never existed, there was no Exodus, the parting of the waters never happened, and the Great Flood was a myth based on the probable flooding of the Black Sea, a LOCAL flood.

    Tyre never fell to Nebuchadnezzar, and the vast amount of errors in the Bible could fill a book of equal thickness.

    Time to open your eyes.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Allie Ron's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Allie Ron's comment.
    in reply to Eaglesharpshot (Show the comment)
  • Allie Ron

    Well, you're a moron, then.

    Just go to the CERN website and READ THE SCIENCE.

    Evolution is merely the explanation of the diversity of life.

    Abiogenesis, a hypothesis which will soon become a theory, is NOT evolution.

    The "Big Bang" or "Big Bounce" is also a solid theory, supported by massive amounts of evidence.

    Seriously, why are you so ignorant in an age when this is theoretically impossible ?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Allie Ron's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Allie Ron's comment.
    in reply to Eaglesharpshot (Show the comment)
  • bacdac11

    Abiogenesis is not a theory.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate bacdac11's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate bacdac11's comment.
    in reply to Eaglesharpshot (Show the comment)
  • Eaglesharpshot

    Evolution: The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water causing several molecules to combine in a random way which by chance resulted in a living cell. The cell then divided and evolved into higher life forms. This view is now proven to be immature to the degree of being ridiculous. The most modern laboratory is unable to create a living cell. In fact, scientists have been unable to create a single left-hand protein molecule as found in all animals.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Eaglesharpshot's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Eaglesharpshot's comment.
  • Eaglesharpshot

    Also isn't it funny how the Large Hadron Collider has failed to replicate the big bang in its 15 years of existence.... Hmmm... All your so called, "valid evidence" cant seem to begin to prove or replicate what began human life and earth itself!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Eaglesharpshot's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Eaglesharpshot's comment.
  • Eaglesharpshot

    The Bible has proven to be more historically and archaeologically accurate than any other ancient book. It has been subjected to the minutest scientific textual analysis possible to humanity and has been proven to be authentic in every way. Historical evidence routinely includes ancient literature, business records, and government documents, analyzed in conjunction with linguistics, geography, and archaeological analysis of physical objects, using forensic science techniques.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Eaglesharpshot's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Eaglesharpshot's comment.
  • mike davis

    By the way, I hope you're not married, Christbots:

    'They which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage. -- Luke 20:35

    Jesus told his disciples to leave their wives and families. He also said that married men will not go to Heaven, and women cannot get into Heaven AT ALL.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mike davis's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate mike davis's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Advertisement
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later